nrc.nl
Contemporary Science Fiction: A Dystopian Turn
This article challenges the notion that science fiction solely depicts utopian futures, arguing that contemporary works often explore dystopian themes reflecting anxieties around technology and its impact on humanity, citing examples from film, art, and literature.
- What alternative approach to envisioning the future is suggested, and how does this approach differ from traditional narratives of technological progress?
- The article concludes that a more mature approach to envisioning the future is needed, one that acknowledges potential downsides and ethical considerations related to technological advancement rather than solely focusing on optimistic progress narratives. The author advocates for art that critically examines power dynamics, democratic processes, and the potential misuse of technology, emphasizing a shift from solely technological solutions to a more holistic and socially responsible approach.
- What is the prevailing misconception regarding science fiction's portrayal of the future, and how does contemporary science fiction challenge this perception?
- This article discusses the misconception that science fiction solely envisions utopian futures, contrasting this with the reality of contemporary science fiction which often explores dystopian themes reflecting anxieties about technology and its impact on humanity. The author cites examples such as Damien Jalet's ballets and Kohei Nawa's designs, challenging anthropocentric views of technology's role in shaping the future.
- How do the anxieties surrounding technology's impact on society, particularly as reflected in the Cold War era and the atomic bombings, shape contemporary science fiction's themes and narratives?
- The author argues against the simplistic view of technological progress as solely beneficial, highlighting the anxieties surrounding uncontrolled technological advancements and their ethical implications, citing the Cold War era and the atomic bombings as key influences shaping science fiction's evolution. The piece uses examples from various forms of art, including film (Interstellar, Tenet), and the works of authors like Ursula K. Le Guin and William Gibson, to illustrate this perspective.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article is heavily skewed towards a critical perspective of Boudry's viewpoint and the idea of science fiction as a blueprint for a better future. The selection and sequencing of examples and arguments consistently reinforce this negative framing.
Language Bias
While the language is generally objective, terms like "techbros" and descriptions of Boudry's view as "meewarig" (pitying) and his belief as "postalgisch" (post-nostalgic) reveal a degree of subjective judgment and loaded language. Neutral alternatives could include "technologists," "critical," and "reflective.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the critique of Maarten Boudry's perspective and the pessimistic view of science fiction, potentially omitting alternative viewpoints or more optimistic interpretations of technological advancement. It does not delve into the potential benefits or positive aspects of technological progress, possibly creating an unbalanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between a purely optimistic view of technological progress and a completely pessimistic one, neglecting the nuanced reality that technological advancement can have both positive and negative consequences.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the unrealistic optimism of technological advancements, highlighting how the focus on technological progress often overlooks ethical considerations and exacerbates existing inequalities. The concentration of power and wealth among tech elites, coupled with the lack of democratic checks and balances, contributes to a widening gap between the rich and poor, hindering progress toward reduced inequality. The critique of "Big Tech" utopian visions further emphasizes this negative impact.