Couple with Spina Bifida Overcome Discrimination to Adopt Daughter

Couple with Spina Bifida Overcome Discrimination to Adopt Daughter

cbsnews.com

Couple with Spina Bifida Overcome Discrimination to Adopt Daughter

Kelly and Larry Peterson, a couple with spina bifida, faced discrimination when adopting due to their disability; however, they successfully adopted Hadley, a daughter with spina bifida, autism, and a speech disorder, highlighting ongoing challenges in adoption despite the Americans with Disabilities Act.

English
United States
Human Rights ViolationsHealthHealthcareDiscriminationDisabilityAdoptionAmericans With Disabilities ActSpina Bifida
Shriners Hospitals For Children
Kelly PetersonLarry PetersonHadley PetersonJennifer Kelly
How did the couple's shared experience with spina bifida influence their ability to care for their adopted daughter, and what broader implications does this have for inclusive adoption practices?
The Petersons' story highlights the disparity between legal protections afforded by the Americans with Disabilities Act and the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities. While the ADA prohibits discrimination, the couple's rejection by an adoption agency underscores the persistent systemic bias and limited access to services for people with disabilities. This experience illuminates broader issues around inclusivity and equal access in adoption and beyond.
What specific challenges did a couple with spina bifida face when trying to adopt a child, and what does their experience reveal about the effectiveness of existing legal protections for people with disabilities?
The Peterson couple, both with spina bifida, faced discrimination when seeking to adopt, initially rejected by an agency due to their disability. They persevered, finding an agency that helped them adopt Hadley, a daughter also with spina bifida, autism, and a speech disorder. This demonstrates the ongoing challenges faced by people with disabilities seeking to adopt, despite legal protections.
What are the long-term implications of potential Medicaid cuts on the Peterson family and other similar families raising children with significant medical needs, and how might this impact broader societal discussions on disability and healthcare?
The Peterson family's future concerns regarding potential Medicaid cuts emphasize the precarious financial situation of many families raising children with complex medical needs. Their case underscores the urgent need for increased support for families facing high medical expenses related to disabilities, and for policies that facilitate inclusive adoption practices, ensuring equal opportunities for all prospective parents regardless of their disabilities. The family's ongoing financial uncertainty is representative of many families with children having special needs.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The framing is overwhelmingly positive, focusing on the Peterson's resilience and love story. This is not inherently biased, but it might unintentionally minimize the systematic discrimination faced by families with disabilities more broadly. The headline (if there was one) and introduction likely emphasized the heartwarming aspect of the story, which could potentially overshadow the larger issue of discrimination in adoption.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and positive, focusing on the family's strength and love. There is no overtly loaded language. While the repeated use of "love" might be considered slightly sentimental, it aligns with the overall positive and heartwarming tone of the story.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the Peterson's personal journey and experience, which is positive. However, it lacks broader statistics on adoption rates for families with disabilities, or the prevalence of discrimination faced by prospective parents with disabilities. While the anecdote of the agency that refused them is illustrative, more data on this would strengthen the piece and give a more comprehensive picture of the issue. Additionally, there is little discussion of the support systems and policies, beyond federal benefits and Shriners Hospitals, available to families adopting children with medical needs.

Sustainable Development Goals

Reduced Inequality Positive
Direct Relevance

The story highlights the discrimination faced by people with disabilities in adoption, showcasing the positive impact of overcoming these barriers and advocating for equal access. The Petersons' successful adoption of Hadley, a child with similar challenges, directly counters societal biases and promotes inclusivity.