sueddeutsche.de
Death of Michele Rivella: End of an Era for Ferrero
Michele Rivella, instrumental in developing Nutella and other Ferrero products, died on Friday, exactly ten years after the death of Michele Ferrero, marking the end of an era for the confectionery giant.
- What is the significance of Michele Rivella's death for the confectionery industry and Ferrero's future?
- Michele Rivella, a key figure in Ferrero's history and longtime right-hand man to Michele Ferrero, passed away on Friday. He was instrumental in the development of iconic products like Nutella, Mon Chéri, and Kinder Chocolate, working exclusively for Ferrero for his entire career. Rivella retired in 1993.
- How did Rivella contribute to the development of Nutella, and what were the key milestones in its production and marketing?
- Rivella's contribution extended beyond product development; he played a crucial role in the evolution of Nutella, refining the hazelnut-based spread that has become a global phenomenon. His legacy is deeply intertwined with Ferrero's immense success, a company now generating over €18 billion in annual revenue and producing 500,000 tons of Nutella yearly.
- What are the environmental and social implications of Ferrero's production methods, especially considering the high demand for Nutella and its impact on hazelnut farming?
- Rivella's death highlights the enduring impact of his work on the confectionery industry and Ferrero's continued dominance. However, the company's reliance on vast hazelnut plantations raises environmental concerns, highlighting the complex legacy of a product synonymous with global success. The future of Nutella's production, particularly regarding sustainable sourcing, remains a crucial issue.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is largely positive, emphasizing Rivella's contributions and Nutella's success as a global brand. The headline (if any) would likely reinforce this positive narrative. The use of phrases like "riesiger Betrieb" (huge company) and descriptions of Nutella's global reach contribute to this positive framing. The criticism regarding environmental concerns is presented but feels somewhat tacked on at the end, diminishing its impact.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral but contains some potentially loaded terms. For example, describing Nutella as a "riesiger Betrieb" (huge company) could be considered positively loaded, emphasizing its scale and success. The description of Germans as "treuesten Kunden" (most loyal customers) also implies positive connotations. More neutral alternatives could be used, such as 'large company' and 'significant customer base'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the business aspects of Nutella and its creators, but omits discussion of potential downsides of Nutella consumption (health impacts, high sugar content etc.). Additionally, while environmental concerns regarding hazelnut monoculture are mentioned, a balanced perspective including potential solutions or counterarguments from Ferrero is missing.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a somewhat simplistic view of Nutella's success, focusing primarily on its creation and market dominance without exploring potential contributing factors like marketing strategies, consumer trends, or competition. There is no discussion of alternatives to Nutella.
Gender Bias
The article focuses primarily on the male figures involved in Nutella's creation and success (Rivella and Ferrero). There is no mention of the role of women in the company's development or success, leading to an implicit gender bias. The language used is neutral in terms of gender.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights environmental concerns associated with Nutella production, including the use of palm oil and the potential for deforestation due to hazelnut monocultures. While Ferrero claims to use sustainably sourced palm oil, the large scale of production and the impact on hazelnut farming raise concerns about sustainable practices and resource depletion. The vast quantities of Nutella produced (500,000 tons annually) point to unsustainable consumption patterns.