
bbc.com
Dutch Sailor's Diary Reveals 18th-Century Homophobia
In 1725, Dutch sailor Lendert Hazenbos was abandoned on Ascension Island by the Dutch East India Company for sodomy; his diary, rediscovered centuries later, details his suffering and highlights the historical persecution of LGBTQ+ individuals, a reality that persists in 64 countries today.
- What connections can be drawn between the historical persecution of individuals like Lendert Hazenbos and contemporary challenges faced by the LGBTQ+ community globally?
- The rediscovery and retelling of Hazenbos's story emphasizes the enduring legacy of homophobia. While legal punishments have evolved, the ongoing criminalization of same-sex relations in 64 countries globally underscores the need for continued advocacy and legal reforms to protect LGBTQ+ rights.
- What were the immediate consequences of Lendert Hazenbos's abandonment on Ascension Island, and what does his fate reveal about societal attitudes towards homosexuality in the 18th century?
- In 1725, Dutch sailor Lendert Hazenbos was abandoned on Ascension Island for sodomy, a crime punishable by death in the Dutch East India Company. His diary, rediscovered centuries later, details his horrific ordeal of starvation, hallucination, and desperation, highlighting the brutality of historical homophobia.
- How did the initial publication and subsequent rediscovery of Hazenbos's diary shape the understanding of his story and the broader historical context of persecution against LGBTQ+ individuals?
- Hazenbos's story, initially obscured and published anonymously in sensationalized pamphlets, was resurrected by historians who connected his fate to archival records of the VOC. His abandonment reflects the harsh legal and social climate towards homosexuality prevalent in 18th-century Europe.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the tragic and unjust nature of Hazenbos's punishment, thereby eliciting sympathy for him and implicitly criticizing the historical persecution of homosexuals. The headline and opening paragraphs immediately establish the tragic circumstances, setting the tone for the narrative. The inclusion of modern-day statistics on criminalization of same-sex relations further reinforces this framing, implicitly drawing a parallel between past injustices and ongoing discrimination.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although words like "outcast", "tragic", and "inhuman" carry emotional weight. While not inherently biased, they subtly shape the reader's perception. Alternatives such as "isolated", "unfortunate", and "harsh" could maintain impact while reducing emotional coloring. The repeated use of "sodomy" might also benefit from occasional replacement with the less antiquated "same-sex relations.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the historical account of Hazenbos's ordeal and the legal ramifications of his actions in 18th-century Netherlands and globally today. However, it omits discussion of potential mitigating circumstances surrounding Hazenbos's conviction for sodomy. While acknowledging limitations of space, exploring alternative interpretations of the historical context or potential biases in the legal system of the time would strengthen the article. Furthermore, there is limited exploration of the diversity of views on homosexuality within 18th-century Dutch society. While acknowledging the prevalent condemnation, further investigation into whether dissenting opinions existed would enrich the narrative.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the historical persecution of a man for homosexuality, raising awareness about past injustices based on sexual orientation. By shedding light on this historical case, the article indirectly contributes to promoting gender equality and protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. The story serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for LGBTQ+ rights and the importance of combating discrimination and prejudice.