lefigaro.fr
ECB Recommends Holding 72 Hours of Cash for Emergencies
The European Central Bank (ECB) advises European citizens to keep enough cash to cover essential needs for 72 hours, citing instances where digital systems fail during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2022 Ukraine invasion.
- How significant was the increase in cash demand during these crises?
- During the COVID-19 pandemic, euro cash issuance surged by over €140 billion, exceeding typical annual issuance by €85 billion. Near-Ukraine countries saw a 36% increase following the invasion. Even after Spain's network outage, there was a rush to ATMs, exceeding normal levels.
- What prompted the ECB to recommend citizens keep 72 hours' worth of cash on hand?
- Analysis of four European crises—the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ukraine invasion, a major Spanish network outage in April 2025, and the Greek debt crisis—showed increased cash demand during instability. The ECB notes that while not all crises cause this, these instances highlight cash's crucial role when economic, infrastructural, or public trust is severely tested.
- What is the long-term significance of the ECB's recommendation in the context of a growing cashless society?
- The ECB's recommendation highlights a paradox: despite the digital payment trend, cash provides psychological comfort and offline functionality crucial during systemic failures. This underscores the continued importance of physical currency as a safeguard against digital infrastructure disruptions.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents the ECB's recommendation as a counterpoint to the international trend towards cashless societies, framing the advice to hold cash as a prudent measure in times of crisis. The headline, while neutral, sets this counter-narrative tone. The introduction emphasizes the unexpected nature of the recommendation, highlighting its divergence from current trends. This framing could influence readers to consider holding cash more seriously, even if they wouldn't otherwise.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, with the exception of phrases like "augmentation extraordinaire" (extraordinary increase) which adds emphasis. However, this is used to describe factual data rather than convey a subjective opinion. The overall tone is informative and analytical rather than persuasive.
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of potential downsides to holding large amounts of cash at home, such as increased risk of theft or loss. Additionally, it does not address the potential for inflation to erode the value of the cash held in reserve. This omission could provide a more balanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article implicitly presents a false dichotomy between cash and digital payments, implying that one must choose between them. While it acknowledges the rise of digital payments, it fails to explore the potential for a hybrid system where both methods coexist and complement each other. This could lead readers to view the two options as mutually exclusive rather than potentially complementary.
Sustainable Development Goals
The recommendation to keep cash on hand can help mitigate the impact of crises on vulnerable populations who may not have access to digital financial services. Maintaining access to cash during crises can prevent unexpected hardship and maintain a basic standard of living for those most at risk. Although not directly addressing poverty, ensuring access to cash enhances financial resilience.