elpais.com
El Hormiguero's" Financial Success in 2024 Despite New Competition
In 2024, "El Hormiguero's" production company, 7 y Acción, reported €32.9 million in revenue and €8.05 million in dividends for creators Pablo Motos and Jorge Salvador, despite competition from "La Resistencia." The increase in personnel costs to €14.85 million suggests investment to maintain its market position.
- What was the financial impact of "La Resistencia's" launch on "El Hormiguero's" production company, 7 y Acción, in 2024?
- El Hormiguero," Antena 3's flagship program, generated €32.9 million in revenue for its production company, 7 y Acción, in 2024—a 5% increase year-on-year. This success resulted in an €8.05 million dividend payout to creators Pablo Motos and Jorge Salvador, a 60% rise from 2023. Despite new competition from "La Resistencia," 7 y Acción's profits only slightly increased by 0.1%, reaching €6.74 million.
- How do the financial performances of "El Hormiguero" and "La Resistencia" compare, and what factors might account for the differences?
- The robust financial performance of "El Hormiguero" contrasts sharply with its competitor, "La Resistencia." While "El Hormiguero's" revenue surged, "La Resistencia's" production company, Encofrados Encofrasa, reported significantly lower revenue (€2.5 million) and profits (€215,000) in 2023. This disparity highlights the considerable financial advantage "El Hormiguero" holds, likely due to its prime-time slot and lucrative advertising revenue on Antena 3, as opposed to TVE's non-advertising model.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the ongoing competition between "El Hormiguero" and "La Resistencia" for both programs' financial success?
- While "La Resistencia's" arrival in 2024 had a minimal impact on "El Hormiguero's" 2024 financials, the full effect on 7 y Acción's revenue is yet to be seen. The 6% increase in personnel expenses (€14.85 million) suggests that "El Hormiguero" may be investing further in its production to maintain its competitive edge and mitigate potential future revenue loss. The long-term effects of the competition remain to be seen in 2025.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing heavily favors "El Hormiguero." The headline (if there were one) would likely emphasize its financial triumph. The opening paragraph immediately highlights the program's continued financial success and the substantial dividends paid to its creators. This positive framing is maintained throughout, while the information about "La Resistencia" is presented almost as an afterthought, downplaying its potential impact as a competitor.
Language Bias
The language used to describe "El Hormiguero" is overwhelmingly positive, using terms like "machine de hacer dinero" (money-making machine) and highlighting its consistent success and high viewership. In contrast, the description of "La Resistencia" is significantly less effusive, with terms that portray its financial performance as "mucho más humilde" (much more humble). This difference in tone subtly influences the reader's perception of the relative merits of both programs.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the financial success of "El Hormiguero" and briefly mentions the competitor, "La Resistencia." While it states that "La Resistencia"'s revenue is much lower, it omits crucial details about the production costs, advertising revenue models (or lack thereof for TVE), and the overall profitability of "La Resistencia." This selective presentation might unintentionally mislead readers into undervaluing "La Resistencia's" success relative to its circumstances. Furthermore, the article mentions the death of a collaborator, Marta Jiménez, but doesn't discuss the potential impact of this loss on the production or morale of the show.
False Dichotomy
The article subtly frames a false dichotomy by contrasting the significant financial success of "El Hormiguero" with the comparatively modest revenue of "La Resistencia." This comparison implies a direct competition and suggests that "La Resistencia's" lower earnings represent a failure, neglecting the fundamental differences in production environments and funding models between the two shows. The implication is that only financial success defines a successful program.
Gender Bias
The article mentions several collaborators, including both male and female personalities. While it mentions the death of Marta Jiménez, it does so briefly without dwelling on gendered aspects of her career or loss. There's no apparent gender bias in the selection of collaborators or the tone of the article in this regard.
Sustainable Development Goals
The success of "El Hormiguero" demonstrates strong economic growth and job creation within the Spanish entertainment industry. The high profits and dividend payouts to its creators highlight the financial success of the show and its contribution to the economy. The show also employs numerous collaborators and staff, contributing to employment figures.