taz.de
EU Auto Industry Job Losses: Climate Policy and Industrial Strategy
A Transport & Environment study projects that the European auto industry could lose up to one million jobs by 2035 if EU climate rules are weakened, but with effective industrial policy, job losses could be limited to 4 percent, boosting domestic value creation by 11 percent and creating additional jobs in battery production and charging infrastructure.
- How does the study account for the impact of the energy transition on existing combustion engine manufacturing plants?
- The study models three scenarios. Scenario one projects substantial job losses with weakened climate regulations, aligning with GlobalData's market predictions. Scenario three, featuring effective industrial policy, shows the industry maintaining near current employment levels by prioritizing domestic production and e-vehicle demand.
- What are the potential impacts on European auto industry employment under different EU climate and industrial policy scenarios?
- A Transport & Environment study reveals that the European auto industry could lose up to one million jobs in ten years if current EU climate rules are weakened. However, with strengthened EU industrial policy alongside climate targets, job losses could be limited to 4 percent by 2035, compared to current employment of approximately three million.
- What are the key policy recommendations proposed by the study to mitigate job losses and ensure a successful transition to electric mobility?
- The study highlights that boosting the domestic component share in electric vehicles from 25 percent to 18 percent could increase European value creation by 11 percent, potentially leading to higher wages if profits aren't prioritized by corporations. Additional jobs are projected in battery production and charging infrastructure, with spillover effects into other sectors.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The study is framed to highlight the positive potential outcomes of a strong industrial policy combined with climate regulations. The headline and introduction emphasize job preservation and potential wage increases, which might overshadow potential challenges or negative consequences of the transition. The selection and ordering of scenarios also supports this framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms like "wirksame Industriepolitik" (effective industrial policy) and "stärkt die Stellung" (strengthens the position) carry a slightly positive connotation. While not overtly biased, more precise and neutral language could enhance objectivity. For instance, instead of "stärkt die Stellung", a phrase like "supports the competitiveness of" could be used.
Bias by Omission
The study omits the impact of the transformation on existing combustion engine factories. This is acknowledged by a quoted union representative who expresses concern for existing jobs and locations. While the omission is noted, its impact on the overall conclusion is not fully assessed.
False Dichotomy
The study presents three scenarios, but it does not fully explore the nuances or intermediate possibilities between these scenarios. The simplification to three distinct outcomes might oversimplify the complex interplay of factors influencing job losses and gains.
Gender Bias
The study uses gender-neutral language (*in* instead of *innen*) throughout, demonstrating an attempt at inclusivity. However, a more detailed analysis of gender representation in the workforce and potential gendered impacts of job losses or gains would strengthen the study's overall analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The study shows that with effective industrial policy, the European auto industry can prevent job losses and even increase wages by transitioning to e-mobility. This aligns with SDG 8 by promoting sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.