dw.com
Eutelsat CEO: OneWeb Cannot Replace Starlink in Ukraine
Eutelsat's CEO admitted OneWeb cannot replace Starlink in Ukraine due to a massive capacity difference; Starlink boasts approximately 7,000 satellites versus Eutelsat's 600, resulting in a 23-490 times stronger connection, despite Eutelsat's plan for a few thousand terminals in critical areas.
- Why does Eutelsat believe it cannot fully replace Starlink in Ukraine, and what specific limitations does it face?
- The disparity stems from Starlink's approximately 7,000 satellites compared to Eutelsat's 600, and Starlink's superior technology. This results in a 23-490 times greater connection capacity for Starlink in Ukraine, according to Politico.
- What is the primary difference in communication capacity between Starlink and Eutelsat's OneWeb in Ukraine, and what are the immediate implications?
- Eutelsat CEO Eva Berneke acknowledged that their OneWeb satellites cannot replace SpaceX's Starlink system in Ukraine, stating that they could not match Starlink's tens of thousands of terminals. Eutelsat aims for a few thousand terminals for critical areas, highlighting the significant disparity in capacity.
- What are the long-term geopolitical implications of Starlink's dominance in Ukraine's communication infrastructure, and what alternative solutions might emerge?
- Berneke criticized Starlink's dominance, suggesting it creates dependence influenced by the White House or Mar-a-Lago. However, an expert highlighted Starlink's unique solution and technological breakthroughs, filling a void in Ukraine's communication needs. The dependence concern contrasts with the Polish foreign minister's statement that Poland funds Starlink, underscoring the geopolitical complexities.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the significant disparity between Starlink's and Eutelsat's capabilities, highlighting Eutelsat's limitations and Starlink's overwhelming advantage. The inclusion of the direct quote from Musk ('Заткнись, маленький человек') further emphasizes the narrative of Starlink's dominance and the inadequacy of alternatives. The headline (if any) would likely reinforce this imbalance.
Language Bias
The article uses language that favors Starlink, describing Eutelsat's capabilities as insufficient and Starlink as 'unique' and having 'broken technical barriers.' The direct quote from Musk ('Заткнись, маленький человек') adds a layer of inflammatory language. More neutral language could be used to describe the differences in capabilities, avoiding terms like 'broken technical barriers' and focusing on concrete performance metrics.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the limitations of Eutelsat's OneWeb system compared to Starlink, but omits discussion of other potential satellite providers or alternative communication solutions available in Ukraine. This omission might lead readers to believe that Starlink is the only viable option, neglecting the possibility of diverse solutions or a combination of systems.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the choice as solely between Starlink and Eutelsat, ignoring the potential for other communication systems or a multi-system approach. This simplification could mislead readers into believing that only these two options exist.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Starlink's significant contribution to Ukraine's communication infrastructure, showcasing technological innovation in satellite technology that bridges communication gaps during crisis. This is directly relevant to SDG 9, which aims to build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and foster innovation.