nrc.nl
Femicide in the Netherlands: Two Recent Deaths Highlight Systemic Failures
In the Netherlands, approximately every two weeks, a woman is killed by a (ex-)partner, illustrating the ongoing issue of femicide despite a national plan of action and awareness programs; recent cases highlight failures in protection and support systems.
- How can future initiatives most effectively address the root causes of femicide and prevent future tragedies?
- Future efforts to combat femicide must focus on improving police response to threats and strengthening support systems for women experiencing violence. Campaigns raising awareness among professionals and bystanders are crucial, mimicking successful initiatives against child abuse. Increased capacity for shelters is also needed.
- What is the frequency of femicide in the Netherlands, and what specific incidents highlight the issue's persistence?
- In the Netherlands, approximately every two weeks, a woman is killed by a current or former partner. This pattern, termed 'femicide,' is supported by the Leiden University Femicide Monitor, which shows that of 448 women killed from 2014-2024, 60% were femicide victims, all perpetrated by men.
- What systemic failures contribute to the continued occurrence of femicide, despite existing awareness and prevention strategies?
- The recent deaths of two women highlight the persistent issue of femicide in the Netherlands. The cases involved prior threats and police reports, underscoring a systemic failure to adequately protect vulnerable women despite existing awareness programs and a national plan of action.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue around the urgency and severity of femicide in the Netherlands. The use of statistics on the frequency of femicide and detailed descriptions of recent cases immediately establishes a sense of crisis. The headline (while not provided) likely reinforces this framing. While impactful, this framing could be balanced with a section on positive developments or community efforts to combat femicide.
Language Bias
The language used is strong and emotive, using terms like "luguber patroon" (macabre pattern) and "beschamend" (shameful). While aiming to convey the gravity of the situation, this language could be perceived as sensationalist. More neutral terms could be used, for example, instead of "luguber patroon" a more neutral phrase like "recurring pattern" could be used. The word "beschamend" could be replaced with something like "unacceptable.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the violence against women and the failure of systems to prevent it, but lacks data on the effectiveness of current interventions or alternative approaches to prevention. While acknowledging the limitations of space, a brief mention of preventative programs or success stories in other regions could have provided a more balanced perspective. The article also omits discussion on the societal factors that may contribute to femicide.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it could benefit from exploring the complexities of the issue beyond the simple perpetrator-victim dynamic. For example, discussing the role of societal pressures, cultural norms, or economic factors could add depth to the analysis.
Gender Bias
The article focuses on the victims of femicide, which is appropriate given the topic. However, it may unintentionally reinforce gender stereotypes by consistently referring to the perpetrators as "men" and the victims as "women." While factually accurate, this constant reinforcement could be softened by using more inclusive language, such as "perpetrators" and "victims", when appropriate. The article avoids using victim-blaming language.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the alarming issue of femicide in the Netherlands, where women are killed by their partners or ex-partners. This directly relates to SDG 5 (Gender Equality) which aims to end all forms of violence against women and girls. The high number of femicide cases (approximately 44 per year) demonstrates a significant failure to achieve this goal. The article also points to systemic issues, such as insufficient support for women experiencing abuse and a lack of responsiveness from authorities, further hindering progress towards SDG 5.