repubblica.it
France Targets Shein and Temu with Groundbreaking Ultra-Fast Fashion Law
France passed a world-first law targeting Shein and Temu, imposing eco-taxes up to €10 per garment by 2030, banning their advertising, and ending free returns, aiming to curb the environmental impact of ultra-fast fashion and reduce impulsive purchases, amid concerns that 35 clothing items are discarded every second in France.
- How does the French law address the broader context of ultra-fast fashion's supply chain and consumer behavior?
- The French law connects the environmental damage of cheap clothing to that of cigarettes, prohibiting all advertising for ultra-fast fashion. It also introduces a tax on packages from outside Europe and ends free returns. This comprehensive approach targets the entire supply chain, reflecting growing concern over the industry's ecological footprint.
- What immediate actions does the French law take to combat the environmental consequences of ultra-fast fashion platforms like Shein and Temu?
- France has enacted a groundbreaking law targeting ultra-fast fashion platforms Shein and Temu, imposing eco-taxes up to €5 per garment, rising to €10 by 2030, and banning their advertising. This follows the discarding of 35 clothing items per second in France, according to ADEME. The aim is to curb impulsive purchases and their environmental consequences.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this French law for the ultra-fast fashion industry globally and for the balance between environmental protection and consumer affordability?
- This legislation signals a significant shift in how governments address ultra-fast fashion's environmental impact. While praised for its ambition, critics point to the exclusion of major fast-fashion brands. The law's success hinges on its effectiveness in reducing consumption and whether it serves as a model for global regulation. Shein's response, launching 7,220 new items daily (May 22-June 5, 2025), shows the challenges ahead.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction immediately frame ultra-fast fashion as a "catastrophe for the environment." This sets a negative tone and preemptively positions the reader to view the French law favorably. The focus on the negative environmental impacts of Shein and Temu, while valid, overshadows any potential economic benefits or consumer perspectives. The article also highlights the negative impact of fast fashion but does not fully discuss other possible negative consequences such as working conditions in factories.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language, such as "declared war," "catastrophe," and "grave repercussions." These words evoke strong negative feelings toward ultra-fast fashion. While the environmental concerns are valid, the strong language used could be replaced with more neutral terms to maintain objectivity. For example, instead of "catastrophe for the environment", a more neutral description could be "significant environmental impact.
Bias by Omission
The French law focuses heavily on Shein and Temu, omitting other major fast fashion brands like Zara, H&M, Primark, and Kiabi. Environmental activists criticize this omission, arguing it leaves out 90% of low-cost production. The justification appears to be protecting local industry and jobs, but this creates a biased approach that doesn't address the broader issue of fast fashion's environmental impact. This omission could mislead the public into believing the law effectively targets the entire problem, when in reality it addresses only a small part.
False Dichotomy
The article frames the issue as a simple dichotomy: ultra-fast fashion (Shein and Temu) versus sustainable fashion. This ignores the complexities within the fashion industry, such as the varying degrees of sustainability practices among brands and the challenges of transitioning towards more ethical and environmentally friendly production.
Sustainable Development Goals
The French law targets fast fashion platforms like Shein and Temu, aiming to reduce overconsumption and promote sustainable practices. Eco-taxes, advertising bans, and charges on returns aim to discourage impulse buying and encourage more responsible consumption patterns. The law's focus on reducing environmental damage from textile production and waste aligns directly with SDG 12.