taz.de
Global Hunger Rises in 2024 Amidst Climate Change, Conflicts, and Funding Cuts
Due to climate change, conflicts, and crises, global hunger increased in 2024, affecting 1 in 11 people; budget cuts to aid organizations, particularly from the USA and Germany, are hindering progress, prompting Welthungerhilfe to shift strategies toward local community empowerment and climate resilience.
- What are the key factors driving the increase in global hunger in 2024, and what are the immediate consequences?
- In 2024, 1 in 11 people globally suffered from hunger, exceeding 2023's 750 million, due to climate change, conflicts, and crises. This represents a setback in the fight against hunger, with funding cuts exacerbating the issue.
- How are budget cuts to aid organizations impacting efforts to combat hunger, and which countries are most affected?
- The increase in global hunger is linked to factors like climate change, conflict, and economic instability. Budget cuts to aid organizations, especially from the USA, a major donor, and Germany, are hindering progress and reversing past achievements.
- What long-term strategies are needed to address the root causes of hunger, and how can international cooperation be strengthened?
- The shift in strategy by Welthungerhilfe towards local community empowerment, innovative solutions, and international partnerships reflects a need for more sustainable and adaptable approaches to combatting hunger. This includes fostering climate resilience to connect food security with environmental protection.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the negative impact of budget cuts on humanitarian aid and the Welthungerhilfe's response. The headline, while not explicitly biased, sets a tone of urgency and focuses on the increasing number of hungry people. The introduction directly highlights the severity of the situation and the organization's role in addressing it. This could potentially overshadow other important aspects of the global hunger crisis.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, reporting facts and figures from the Welthungerhilfe report and UN data. However, phrases like "heftigen Budgetkürzungen" (severe budget cuts) and "einschneidend" (dramatically impacting) carry a negative connotation that shapes reader perception. While not overtly loaded, these choices contribute to a sense of urgency and crisis.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Welthungerhilfe's report and response, potentially omitting other organizations' reports or perspectives on the global hunger crisis. While mentioning UN data, it doesn't delve into the specifics of their report or compare/contrast different assessments. The article also doesn't explore potential solutions beyond the Welthungerhilfe's strategies, neglecting other approaches or policies that might address the issue.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the causes of hunger, primarily focusing on climate change, crises, and wars, and the effect of budget cuts. While these are significant factors, other contributing elements such as inequality, poverty traps, and lack of access to resources are not fully explored. The solution is also presented as strengthening local communities, innovative approaches and better international partnerships, without exploring the complexities or potential limitations of these methods.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article reports an increase in global hunger in 2024, affecting one in eleven people. This directly contradicts progress toward SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), which aims to end hunger, achieve food security, improve nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture. Budget cuts to aid organizations further hinder progress. The quote "Durch den Klimawandel, Krisen und Kriege waren auch 2024 wieder mehr Menschen weltweit von Hunger betroffen" highlights the negative impact.