nrc.nl
Gronings Language Preservation Program Launched in Eenrum
Fieke Gosselaar teaches Gronings to ten children in Eenrum, Groningen, as part of a program to preserve the endangered dialect, highlighting the contrast with the better-supported Frisian language.
- How do the contrasting situations of Gronings and Frisian highlight the factors influencing the survival of regional languages?
- The declining use of Gronings among children reflects a broader trend of endangered regional languages. While only 17% of inhabitants use Gronings at home, a recent university study shows only 30% of parents currently pass it on, compared to 50% in 1960. This contrasts with Frisian, which enjoys stronger community support and governmental funding.
- What specific actions are being taken to counteract the decline of the Gronings language, and what are the immediate impacts of these actions?
- In Eenrum, Groningen, Fieke Gosselaar teaches Gronings, a regional dialect, to ten primary school children after school. This initiative, part of the 'Tijd voor Toekomst' program, aims to preserve the language, which is facing decline due to decreased parental transmission. The children actively participate, engaging with folklore and playing games.
- What are the long-term implications of the decline of Gronings, and what systemic changes could help ensure its preservation beyond the current initiatives?
- The long-term survival of Gronings depends on continued initiatives like Gosselaar's program, combined with increased societal support and potentially governmental funding similar to that supporting Frisian. The 4 million euros annually allocated to promote Gronings and Drents through the Rijksuniversiteit Groningen and regional media will play a crucial role in language preservation. The difficulty of learning Gronings as an adult and negative societal perceptions must also be addressed.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the decline of Gronings as a significant loss, emphasizing the importance of cultural preservation and the urgency of action. This framing, while understandable, might overshadow other perspectives or priorities within the region. The use of quotes from concerned individuals further strengthens this perspective.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, but some phrasing, such as describing the decline of Gronings as a potential "death" of the language, adds a degree of emotional weight. The repeated use of terms like "zonde" (a pity) also inflects a particular emotional tone into the narrative.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the decline of the Gronings language and the efforts to preserve it, but it omits discussion of potential negative consequences of prioritizing its preservation over other regional languages or cultural initiatives. It also doesn't delve into the economic arguments for or against language preservation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between the success of Frisian language preservation and the struggles faced by Gronings. While highlighting differences in funding and community support, it oversimplifies the complexities of language revitalization efforts.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a program that teaches children the Groningen dialect. This initiative contributes to the preservation of cultural heritage and linguistic diversity, aligning with SDG 4 (Quality Education) which promotes inclusive and equitable quality education and promotes lifelong learning opportunities for all. The program is specifically designed to engage children in learning their local language in a fun, interactive way, thus improving their cultural awareness and sense of belonging.