repubblica.it
High Cost of Raising Children in Italy Drives Down Birth Rate
A Milanese family can expect to spend 30% of its disposable income on raising a child to age 18, totaling €156,000, an increase of 12% since 2022, impacting birth rates.
- How do the costs break down across different age groups, and what are the major expense categories?
- Costs vary significantly across age groups. The 0-3 age group costs €11,700-€27,000; 4-5, €10,700-€30,000; primary school, €31,500-€46,000; and secondary school, €75,000-€109,700. Major expenses include food, education, technology, extracurricular activities, and childcare.
- What is the estimated cost of raising a child in Milan from birth to age 18, and how does this compare to previous years?
- Raising a child in Milan from birth to age 18 costs an estimated €156,000, ranging from €107,000 to €205,000 depending on individual circumstances. This represents a 12% increase since 2022, exceeding the average inflation rate of 9%.
- What are the broader societal implications of these high costs, and what potential solutions or mitigations might be considered?
- The high cost of raising children contributes to Italy's low birth rate, impacting the country's future workforce and economic growth. Potential solutions might include government subsidies, affordable childcare, and tax incentives to support families. The significant cost increase, exceeding inflation, further exacerbates this issue.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the high cost of raising children in Italy as a major contributing factor to the country's low birth rate. While acknowledging individual variations, the article emphasizes the significant financial burden, using statistics and specific examples (e.g., 30% of disposable income, €156,000 total cost) to highlight the challenge. This framing might lead readers to focus primarily on the economic aspect, potentially overlooking other social or cultural factors influencing fertility rates. The headline, while not explicitly provided, would likely reinforce this economic focus.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual, relying on statistics and expert opinions from Moneyfarm. However, phrases like "precipitata in una spirale ormai strutturale" (precipitated into a now structural spiral) and "un carico complessivo comunque elevato" (a still high overall burden) carry slightly negative connotations, suggesting a sense of crisis or overwhelming difficulty. While not overtly biased, these choices could subtly influence reader perception.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the financial costs of raising children, potentially omitting other crucial factors contributing to low fertility rates. These might include changing social attitudes towards parenthood, career aspirations conflicting with family planning, limited access to affordable childcare, or government policies impacting family support. While acknowledging individual variations, a more comprehensive analysis incorporating these factors would provide a more nuanced understanding.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't explicitly present a false dichotomy, but its strong emphasis on the economic aspect might implicitly suggest that solving the financial burden would automatically lead to higher birth rates. This overlooks the complex interplay of economic, social, and cultural factors influencing reproductive decisions.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't exhibit overt gender bias. While it mentions families and parents, it doesn't disproportionately focus on mothers or fathers or use gendered language to describe parental roles. However, the article's focus on financial costs could indirectly disproportionately affect women, given their often larger role in childcare.
Sustainable Development Goals
The high cost of raising children in Italy, especially in urban areas like Milan, significantly impacts families' financial well-being. This can push families, particularly lower-income ones, closer to or into poverty, hindering their ability to meet basic needs and achieve financial stability. The article highlights the substantial financial burden, potentially exacerbating existing inequalities and contributing to lower birth rates.