dw.com
Historian Links 1938 'Polenaktion' to Current EU Border Crisis
Historian Stephan Lehnstaedt compares the 1938 'Polenaktion,' where Nazi Germany expelled Polish Jews who were then rejected by Poland, to the current EU border crisis, noting similar patterns of rejection and the potential for escalating xenophobia, although the ultimate consequences differ significantly.
- What historical parallels does Stephan Lehnstaedt draw between the 1938 'Polenaktion' and current EU border policies, focusing on immediate consequences?
- In 1938, Nazi Germany expelled thousands of Polish Jews, who were denied entry by Poland, forcing them into a no-man's-land. This 'Polenaktion' mirrors current EU border policies, where migrants face rejection and harsh conditions, although the consequences differ significantly. The event also triggered the assassination of a German diplomat, escalating antisemitism.
- How did the 1938 'Polenaktion' contribute to the escalation of antisemitism in Nazi Germany, and what broader implications does this hold for current border control debates?
- Historian Stephan Lehnstaedt draws parallels between the 1938 'Polenaktion' and the current EU border situation, highlighting the mutual rejection of perceived outsiders. Both cases demonstrate how border controls can create no-man's-lands, where individuals are left vulnerable and without recourse. The 1938 event led to increased antisemitism and violence.
- What are the potential long-term economic and societal consequences of the 'out of sight, out of mind' approach to managing EU borders, as highlighted by the historical precedent of the 'Polenaktion'?
- Lehnstaedt warns that escalating border policies, like the 'Polenaktion', can fuel xenophobia and violence. The use of isolated incidents of violence by migrants to justify broader hatred mirrors past patterns. He suggests that the 'out of sight, out of mind' approach to border issues may have severe long-term economic and social consequences.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the current situation at the EU border through the lens of the 1938 Polenaktion, drawing parallels to highlight the potential dangers of rejecting refugees and migrants. This framing emphasizes the potential for escalating violence and anti-foreigner sentiment, directing the reader's interpretation towards a negative view of current border control policies. The headline, if any, would likely reinforce this framing. The use of the Polenaktion as a primary historical comparison strongly influences the reader's understanding of the situation, potentially overshadowing other relevant contexts or perspectives.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language such as "fatal" memories, "zjadliwy chrześcijański antysemityzm" (corrosive Christian anti-Semitism), and describes the conditions at the border as "nędzne" (miserable). While these terms accurately reflect the historical context and the gravity of the situation, they are emotionally charged and could be presented more neutrally. For example, instead of "zjadliwy chrześcijański antysemityzm," the author could use "widespread Christian anti-Semitism." The use of the term 'foreign' multiple times, without exploring the reasons these individuals are considered 'foreign' may itself be an indication of an underlying bias, which needs exploration.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the historical parallel between the 1938 Polenaktion and the current situation at the Polish-Belarusian border, potentially omitting other historical examples of border closures and their consequences. While the Polenaktion is relevant, a more comprehensive analysis of various historical border control measures and their impacts on different groups of people might provide a more nuanced understanding. The article also doesn't explore the motivations of those currently involved in border control beyond the assertion that they are rejecting those seen as 'foreign'. More detail on the current political and social context is needed.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified eitheor framing by primarily focusing on the parallels between the 1938 Polenaktion and the current border situation. While there are similarities in the rejection of people seen as 'foreign,' the article could benefit from a more nuanced presentation that acknowledges the significant differences between the historical context of Nazi Germany and the current situation at the EU border. The article might also benefit from incorporating different perspectives on the current situation; not everyone on either side of the border sees those crossing as inherently 'foreign' and undesirable.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article draws parallels between current border control policies and the 1938 Polenaktion, highlighting how exclusionary practices can exacerbate inequality and human rights violations. The historical context emphasizes how policies that reject refugees and migrants based on their origin or perceived "otherness" lead to dire humanitarian consequences and deepen societal divisions. The quote about the "drastic rejection of people perceived as foreign" directly points to the creation of inequality and the denial of basic human rights.