nrc.nl
Integration Challenges for Statusholders in the Netherlands
A WODC study reveals that prolonged stays in asylum reception centers negatively impact statusholders' integration in the Netherlands, highlighting the importance of shorter stays and active integration programs.
Dutch
Netherlands
European UnionLabour MarketPolicyRefugees And MigrationEmploymentAsylumHousingIntegration
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- En Datacentrum (Wodc)
Kasper OttenMarjolein Faber
- How does the housing shortage affect the integration process of statusholders?
- The housing shortage significantly impacts statusholders' integration. A prolonged stay in reception centers due to lack of housing negatively affects their chances of finding paid work and becoming self-sufficient.
- What is the main finding of the WODC study regarding statusholders' integration?
- A shorter stay in asylum reception centers leads to better integration for statusholders. Those with prolonged stays, especially involving frequent moves, struggle more with language acquisition, employment, and overall societal integration.
- How can an active approach to reception improve the integration of statusholders?
- A more active approach to reception, including early access to language lessons and work opportunities, is beneficial. Allowing asylum seekers to work earlier, as recently ruled by the court, contributes to their successful integration.
- What is the WODC researcher's opinion on the proposed austere asylum reception regime?
- The proposed austere asylum reception regime is counterproductive. Instead of deterring asylum seekers, a short and active reception period creates better conditions for integration and self-reliance.
- What are the potential consequences of the government's plan to abolish the municipal quota system?
- The current government's plan to abolish the municipal quota system could worsen the situation. This might lead to fewer municipalities accommodating statusholders, resulting in extended stays in reception centers.