t24.com.tr
Investigation Launched into Doctor Accused of Inducing Premature Labor in Istanbul",
An investigation has been launched into a gynecologist in Istanbul, Turkey, Dr. P. Ç., accused of administering medication to induce premature labor in approximately 8,000 patients between 2015 and 2025 without their knowledge or consent, resulting in the temporary closure of the hospital's maternity ward.
- What is the core allegation against Dr. P. Ç., and what immediate actions have been taken?
- Dr. P. Ç., a gynecologist at a private hospital in Sancaktepe, Istanbul, is accused of using the drug Cytotec to induce premature labor in patients without their consent. Following a complaint in September 2025, an investigation was launched, and the hospital's maternity ward was temporarily closed on September 19, 2025. A criminal complaint has also been filed.
- What are the broader implications of this case for healthcare practices and patient safety in Turkey?
- This case highlights potential systemic issues regarding patient autonomy and informed consent within Turkish healthcare. The investigation's findings will likely influence future regulations and oversight of medical practices to improve patient safety and prevent similar incidents. The temporary closure of the maternity ward underscores the seriousness of the accusations and the authorities' commitment to addressing the issue.
- What is the scale of the alleged malpractice, and what are the potential consequences for the patients involved?
- The allegations involve approximately 8,000 births at the hospital between 2015 and 2025, a significant portion of which allegedly occurred prematurely (weeks 32, 34, and 36). Some infants reportedly required intensive care, and some sustained permanent health problems due to premature birth. The long-term health consequences for both mothers and babies are currently under investigation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a fairly neutral framing of the accusations against Dr. P. Ç. While it reports the allegations and the subsequent investigation, it avoids explicitly labeling the doctor as guilty. The headline and introduction clearly state the allegations as "iddialar" (allegations) and "iddia edilmiştir" (it has been alleged), maintaining a degree of objectivity. However, the repeated mention of the high number of early births (8000 in 10 years) might subtly influence the reader towards believing the accusations are more likely to be true.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, using terms like "iddia edilmiştir" (it has been alleged) and "ileri sürüldü" (it was alleged). There is a minimal use of emotionally charged language. The inclusion of the official statements from the health ministry adds to the neutrality.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including perspectives from Dr. P. Ç. or the hospital's administration. While the investigation is ongoing, presenting their side of the story would offer a more balanced perspective. Additionally, details about the specific health consequences for the babies born prematurely could be included for a more complete picture.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article reports on a medical malpractice investigation where a doctor is accused of inducing premature births without patient consent. This directly impacts maternal and child health, potentially leading to serious health complications and even death for both mother and child. The alleged actions are a clear violation of ethical medical practices and patient rights, resulting in negative health outcomes and undermining trust in the healthcare system. The investigation itself highlights the need for stronger regulatory oversight to protect patient safety.