kathimerini.gr
Israel's Economy Defies Conflicts, Boosted by Tech and Foreign Investment
Despite multiple wars and political instability, Israel's economy shows resilience, with its Tel Aviv Stock Exchange index rebounding strongly and foreign investment surging as the country's tech sector and government spending bolster growth, despite a 20% GDP contraction in Q4 2023.
- How has foreign investment contributed to Israel's economic performance during the recent period of conflict?
- This economic strength is attributed to foreign investment, despite ongoing conflicts, mobilization of hundreds of thousands of soldiers, war crime allegations, and a prolonged political crisis. The TASE reports a tripling of new investor accounts in 2024 compared to 2023, reaching 161,000 new accounts, with 87,000 more in the first half of 2025, 33,000 from large investment firms. Foreign investors purchased TASE shares worth $743 million in May 2025 alone and about $2.7 billion since the start of the year.
- What are the long-term implications of Israel's current economic performance, considering both internal and external factors?
- Israel's tech sector, representing 20% of GDP and 56% of exports, and government investment in R&D are key factors. Increased foreign investment, driven by confidence in Israel's technological dynamism and long-term prospects, plays a crucial role. The OECD predicts 4.9% GDP growth in 2026. The strengthening shekel and projected inflation decrease also contribute to the positive outlook.
- What is the most significant factor behind Israel's economic resilience despite simultaneous military conflicts and internal political challenges?
- Despite multiple warfronts, Israel's economy shows resilience. The Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) index, after a 23% drop in October 2023, has rebounded, exceeding pre-war levels and reaching 200% gains compared to October 2023 lows by July 17, 2024. While the GDP shrank nearly 20% in the last quarter of 2023, the year saw a 2% growth, followed by 1% in 2024.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing heavily emphasizes the positive economic performance of Israel despite ongoing conflicts, painting a picture of remarkable resilience. The headline (if any) likely focused on the economic success, downplaying the broader context of war and political instability. The emphasis on stock market gains and foreign investment, while factually correct, creates a narrative that overshadows potential negative consequences. The positive economic figures are presented prominently, potentially creating a disproportionate focus on the financial aspects over the human cost of the conflict.
Language Bias
The language used is largely positive and celebratory, describing the economic recovery as "impressive" and "remarkable." Terms like "surprisingly strong" and "dramatic recovery" carry positive connotations that influence reader perception. While factual, the selection and emphasis of words contribute to a positive bias. Neutral alternatives could include phrases like "significant growth" or "economic rebound." The use of the phrase "has largely recovered" presents only one side of the complex story.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the positive aspects of Israel's economy post-conflict, potentially omitting challenges or negative consequences not directly related to the stock market's performance. While acknowledging the war and political crisis, the analysis minimizes their overall impact. Further investigation into the social and humanitarian costs, the long-term effects on specific sectors, and the perspectives of those negatively impacted by the conflict would provide a more balanced view. The article also lacks information about the government's spending during the conflict and the extent of its impact on the reported growth.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the situation by emphasizing the resilience of the Israeli economy and the influx of foreign investment, without fully exploring the complexities of the geopolitical situation and its potential long-term impacts. It focuses on the positive aspects of economic recovery, neglecting counterarguments or alternative explanations for the economic growth.
Gender Bias
The article mentions several male experts (Hadar Romano and Avi Hasson), but does not include female voices or perspectives. This lack of gender diversity in sources limits a complete understanding of how the conflict and economic recovery are affecting different segments of the population. It's possible that women's experiences differ in this context, and excluding their input results in skewed representation.
Sustainable Development Goals
Despite multiple military conflicts, Israel's economy demonstrates resilience with continued growth and stock market gains exceeding other Middle Eastern countries. This is attributed to high technology, foreign investment, and government spending. The article highlights significant increases in investment accounts and foreign investment in Israeli companies, all pointing towards a positive impact on economic growth and job creation.