repubblica.it
Italian Consumer Prices: Soaring Flight and Food Costs
Based on Istat data analyzed by Unc, European flights saw a 156.5% price increase from June 2021 to June 2025, while domestic flights increased by 124.9%, olive oil by 59.5%, and other goods like butter, electricity, and jewelry also experienced significant price hikes, far exceeding the overall inflation of 17.8%.
- What factors contributed to the substantial price increases in specific sectors like air travel and food products?
- The Italian consumer organization Unc analyzed Istat data to identify the most significant price increases since the start of the war in Ukraine (February 2022). The study uses June 2021 as a baseline to account for seasonality. Food products constitute a large portion of the top 40 most affected items.
- What are the most significant price increases observed in Italy since June 2021, and how do these compare to overall inflation?
- Between June 2021 and June 2025, European flights saw a 156.5% price increase, while domestic flights rose 124.9%. Olive oil prices increased by 59.5% during the same period. These increases significantly outpace the overall inflation rate of 17.8%.
- What are the long-term economic and social implications of these persistent price increases, particularly in relation to essential food items?
- While some products like flour and pasta have seen price decreases on a year-over-year basis, their prices remain substantially higher than pre-crisis levels (June 2021), indicating a lasting impact of price increases. This suggests the effects of inflation and supply chain disruptions may be long-lasting.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the severity of price increases, using terms like "astronomical" and "insustainable." The selection and ordering of the products in the top ten list influence reader perception, highlighting specific products as particularly problematic. For example, the headline focuses on the winners of the price increase, rather than providing a more balanced view.
Language Bias
The article uses charged language such as "astronomical increments," "stellar prices," and "unacceptable increases." These terms evoke strong emotional responses and skew the reader's perception of the price changes. More neutral language such as "significant increases," "high prices," and "substantial increases" would provide a more objective tone.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on price increases, neglecting potential contributing factors like supply chain disruptions, geopolitical events, or changes in consumer demand. While the inclusion of general inflation data provides some context, a more comprehensive analysis would explore these elements to offer a more nuanced understanding of the price increases. The article also omits discussion of government policies or industry practices that may have influenced these price changes.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between 'acceptable' and 'unacceptable' price increases, without defining clear thresholds. This simplifies a complex issue with various economic and social factors influencing what constitutes an acceptable price change for different consumer groups.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights significant price increases in various goods and services since February 2022, impacting consumer affordability and potentially exacerbating existing inequalities. The disproportionate impact on essential goods like food further increases the inequality gap.