kathimerini.gr
Latronico's "La Perfezione": A Modern Reimagining of Perec's "Things
Vincenzo Latronico's "La Perfezione" (Loggia), a reimagining of Georges Perec's "Things," follows a young couple in 2010s Berlin whose lives, filled with consumer goods and digital culture, mirror themes of object symbolism and existential ennui from Perec's 1965 novel; the book was shortlisted for the 2024 International Booker Prize.
- How does Latronico's reimagining of Perec's "Things" reflect contemporary societal trends and values?
- Latronico's "La Perfezione" subtly reflects societal changes since Perec's era. While the narrative structure remains similar, the updated setting highlights how consumerism and digital culture shape modern relationships with objects. The couple's seemingly idyllic life in Berlin, filled with designer items and social media, ultimately underscores a sense of universal ennui that transcends time and location.
- What is the central theme explored in Vincenzo Latronico's "La Perfezione," and how does it connect to the original work by Georges Perec?
- Vincenzo Latronico's novel, "La Perfezione," is a reimagining of Georges Perec's 1965 work, "Things." Latronico explicitly acknowledges this homage, replicating Perec's style and structure while updating the setting to 2010s Berlin. The novel follows a young couple's life through their possessions, mirroring Perec's exploration of objects and their symbolic weight.
- What does the inclusion of "La Perfezione" on the Booker Prize shortlist suggest about the current literary landscape and evolving reader preferences?
- The novel's inclusion on the Booker Prize shortlist signifies a growing interest in metafiction and reinterpretations of classic texts. Latronico's updated take on Perec's work prompts reflection on how our relationship with material possessions continues to evolve and its impact on individual experiences and broader societal trends, suggesting a timeless quality to Perec's original themes.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the imitation aspect of Latronico's work, potentially overshadowing other aspects of the book's merit or artistic choices. The headline or introduction could have focused more on the themes or stylistic choices rather than solely on the homage.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. However, terms like "terrifying" and "impressive" could be considered subjective value judgments rather than objective analysis. The author uses subjective language such as 'impressive or terrifying, I don't know', which adds a level of subjectivity to the analysis. This could be improved by substituting them with more neutral language describing the reader response instead of directly evaluating the work.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the similarities between Latronico's work and Perec's 'Things', potentially omitting analysis of Latronico's unique contributions or style. It also doesn't discuss the critical reception of 'The Perfection' beyond its Booker Prize nomination.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a somewhat simplistic view of the book's impact, characterizing it as either 'impressive' or 'terrifying' without exploring a range of possible interpretations.