lequipe.fr
Ligue 1+ Launch Sees Sharp Drop in Illegal Streaming
The launch of Ligue 1+ in France saw a dramatic decrease in illegal streaming viewership (1,000-2,000 viewers) compared to the previous season (150,000+), due to proactive legal action and ISP blocking of pirate sites before and during match broadcasts, resulting in approximately 160 blocked sites on the first day alone.
- What impact did the launch of Ligue 1+ have on illegal streaming of French football matches, and what factors contributed to this outcome?
- The launch of Ligue 1+, a new French football league broadcaster, saw a significant decrease in illegal streaming compared to the previous year. While illegal streams existed on platforms like Telegram and X, they reached only 1,000–2,000 viewers, far fewer than the 150,000+ viewers of illegal streams during the 2024-2025 season launch. This decrease is attributed to proactive measures by the LFP and legal changes.
- How did changes in legal frameworks and the LFP's approach to combating piracy influence the number of illegal streams during the Ligue 1+ launch?
- The reduced illegal streaming is linked to the LFP's proactive approach, including preemptive blocking of pirate websites by French ISPs. This contrasts with the previous year's reactive approach, where sites were blocked only after being identified as illegal. The new strategy, aided by legal changes allowing for preemptive injunctions, resulted in blocking nearly 160 sites on the first day of the season, compared to 50 the previous year.
- What are the potential future implications of the proposed law allowing real-time IP address blocking for the fight against illegal streaming of sports events?
- Future implications include a proposed law allowing real-time IP address blocking, potentially eliminating illegal streams instantly. Combined with increased penalties (three years imprisonment and €300,000 fine), this creates a significantly harsher environment for illegal streaming. This proactive strategy, driven by the understanding of piracy's impact on the league, signals a stronger stance against illegal content.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative emphasizes the success of the LFP's anti-piracy efforts, highlighting the decrease in illegal streams and the effectiveness of new measures. The headline and opening paragraphs set this positive tone. This framing might overshadow the ongoing challenges and potential limitations of the anti-piracy strategies.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms like "pirates" and "illegal streaming" carry negative connotations. The use of "clandestine spectators" also adds to the negative framing of those using illegal streams. More neutral alternatives could be: 'individuals accessing unauthorized streams', 'viewers using unofficial platforms', etc.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the decrease in illegal streaming, but omits discussion of the potential reasons behind the initial high numbers of illegal streams, such as the pricing of the official streaming service. It also doesn't explore the effectiveness of the new measures on different platforms beyond Telegram. While acknowledging limitations of space, a brief mention of these points would improve the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic 'us vs. them' narrative, pitting the LFP against illegal streamers, without exploring the complexities of consumer behavior and the role of affordability in piracy. The focus is on the success of anti-piracy measures rather than exploring alternative solutions to address consumer dissatisfaction.
Sustainable Development Goals
The crackdown on illegal streaming reduces the unfair advantage those who cannot afford legal access had, promoting fairer access to sports content. The lower price point of Ligue 1+ compared to previous seasons also contributes to this.