kathimerini.gr
Maniatis's "Book of Evil" Explores Mechanisms of Societal Harm
George Maniatis's new novel, "The Book of Evil," analyzes mechanisms harming life's goodness, reflecting his belief that evil is pervasive and requires proactive analysis; the book's release follows his extensive career encompassing nearly 100 plays, numerous poems and short stories, and 28 novels.
- What are the core themes explored in Maniatis's "The Book of Evil," and what societal implications are revealed through his perspective on evil?
- George Maniatis, a prolific author with nearly 100 plays, dozens of poems and short stories, and 28 novels, recently released "The Book of Evil," exploring mechanisms that harm life's goodness. He describes evil as mechanisms harming life's good, countered through writing, sometimes aggressively, patiently, or through deliberate ignorance.
- How does Maniatis's approach to portraying 'evil' characters in his works differ from his depiction of 'marginalized' characters, and what insights does this reveal about his creative process?
- Maniatis's new novel, "The Book of Evil," reflects his view that evil is pervasive, urging analysis of its mechanisms before they affect us. He uses characters who've attempted to usurp God's role, highlighting the dangers of such ambition, drawing parallels to Lao Tzu's warning against such hubris.
- Considering the significant portion of Maniatis's theatrical works remain unperformed, what does this indicate about the relationship between artistic creation, societal acceptance, and the evolution of cultural understanding?
- Maniatis's work consistently grapples with existential questions, often left unaddressed in society. His plays, many remaining unperformed, await their moment, reflecting societal readiness to confront deeper truths. His perspective highlights the dynamic between art, societal awareness, and the passage of time.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the author's prolific work and unique perspective, creating a positive portrayal. The questions are generally open-ended, allowing the author to elaborate on his views without significant challenge or counter-arguments.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, except for some loaded terms such as 'esoteric' and 'panicked' when describing political opinions, which could be considered biased.
Bias by Omission
The interview focuses heavily on the author's opinions and experiences, potentially omitting other relevant perspectives on the topics discussed. There is no mention of any critics' reviews or alternative interpretations of his work. The political views expressed are presented without counterpoints.
False Dichotomy
The interview presents a dichotomy between 'good' and 'evil', simplifying complex social and political issues. The discussion of the Left's recent actions is framed as either having 'lost its composure' or not, lacking nuance.
Sustainable Development Goals
The interviewee's discussion on the mechanisms that harm the good of life and his reflections on the misuse of power ('those who decided to play the role of God') are indirectly relevant to SDG 16, focusing on strong institutions and promoting just and peaceful societies. His commentary on the failings of the Left and his analysis of current political events contribute to a discussion of good governance and accountability, which are central to SDG 16.