lexpress.fr
Mass Return of Afghans from Iran Exacerbates Afghanistan's Humanitarian Crisis
Between June 1st and July 5th, 2025, 449,218 Afghans returned to Afghanistan from Iran due to an Iranian government deadline, adding to the 1.4 million who returned in 2025 from Pakistan and Iran. This mass return is exacerbating Afghanistan's humanitarian crisis and may destabilize the region.
- What is the immediate impact of Iran's expulsion of Afghan migrants on Afghanistan's humanitarian crisis?
- Between June 1st and July 5th, 2025, 449,218 Afghans returned to Afghanistan from Iran, totaling 906,326 for the entire year. This followed Iran's deadline for 4 million undocumented Afghans to leave by July 6th, leading to a surge in border crossings, with 40,000 crossing daily at Islam Qala.
- How are the expulsions impacting the returnees, and what role does international pressure play in the situation?
- The mass return is driven by Iran's expulsion policy, creating immense strain on Afghanistan's already fragile humanitarian situation. Many returnees reported coercion, arrests, and financial losses. This influx adds to the 1.4 million Afghans who returned from Pakistan and Iran in 2025 alone, exacerbating existing poverty, unemployment, and climate change challenges.
- What are the long-term implications of this mass return for regional stability and international migration patterns?
- The forced return of Afghans from Iran risks destabilizing Afghanistan further and potentially accelerating migration to Europe. While Iran cites capacity limits, the situation highlights the interconnectedness of regional migration and the need for international cooperation to address the root causes of displacement and support vulnerable populations.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the sheer number of returning Afghans and the strain on Afghanistan's resources. While presenting statistics and quotes from officials and refugees, the narrative's structure subtly highlights the negative consequences of the mass return. The headline (if there was one) would likely reinforce this focus. This could lead to an unbalanced perception that overlooks any positive aspects or potential solutions.
Language Bias
While largely neutral in its reporting of facts and figures, the article uses phrases like "departure precipitated" and "mass return", which imply a negative impact, suggesting a potentially biased tone. Subtle language could be improved for greater neutrality.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the numbers of Afghan refugees returning from Iran and the logistical challenges this presents, but it gives limited detail on the experiences of those who chose to stay in Iran despite the deadline. There is also limited information on the long-term consequences for those who returned to Afghanistan, beyond stating that the country is struggling to cope.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy: Afghans are either forced to leave Iran or choose to stay, ignoring the complexities of the situation. Many Afghans may have faced pressure, but not necessarily outright force, and their reasons for leaving are likely multifaceted and not always a simple choice between staying and leaving.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't explicitly focus on gender, but it could benefit from exploring the differentiated experiences of men and women among the returning refugees. Women and girls often face unique challenges upon return, such as limited access to resources and increased risk of violence.
Sustainable Development Goals
The return of Afghan refugees to Afghanistan, a country already facing significant poverty and unemployment, exacerbates existing economic challenges and hinders progress towards poverty reduction. The mass return puts a strain on already limited resources and infrastructure, potentially increasing poverty levels among both returning refugees and the existing population. Quotes highlighting the lack of job opportunities and economic hardship faced by returnees support this assessment.