
mk.ru
New Model Predicts Universe's Collapse in 33 Billion Years
A new study suggests the universe will collapse in 33 billion years due to weakening dark energy, a finding supported by data from the Dark Energy Survey and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument and contradicting previous theories of indefinite expansion.
- How does this new model differ from previous understandings of dark energy, and what data sources support its conclusions?
- The model challenges the idea of dark energy as a cosmological constant, proposing instead a negative cosmological constant of approximately -1.61. This negative value implies that dark energy's repulsive force will weaken over time, eventually allowing gravity to dominate, causing the universe's collapse. The research utilized the axion Dark Energy (aDE) model, incorporating an axion field.
- What is the projected lifespan of the universe according to this new cosmological model, and what is the primary factor leading to its eventual collapse?
- A new cosmological model suggests the universe's expansion, driven by dark energy, will eventually reverse, leading to a "Big Crunch" in 33 billion years. This contradicts previous theories suggesting indefinite expansion. The model, developed by researchers at Cornell and Shanghai Jiao Tong universities, uses data from the Dark Energy Survey and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument.
- What are the potential limitations or uncertainties associated with this new model, considering the ongoing debate about the nature of dark energy and its impact on the universe's expansion?
- This research significantly impacts our understanding of the universe's lifespan and ultimate fate. By incorporating an axion field and a negative cosmological constant, the aDE model offers a shorter timeline for the universe's existence than previously predicted. Further research into the nature of dark energy is crucial to validate this model and its implications for the universe's future.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introductory paragraphs strongly emphasize the 'Big Crunch' prediction, creating a sense of urgency and potentially exaggerating the certainty of this outcome. The article highlights the new model's shorter timeline compared to previous theories, placing greater emphasis on the 'Big Crunch' narrative. The sequencing prioritizes the new study's findings, potentially downplaying the ongoing uncertainty within the broader scientific community.
Language Bias
The language used tends to be sensationalistic at times, particularly in the introduction and discussion of the 'Big Crunch.' Phrases like "all will come crashing down" could be considered loaded. More neutral alternatives might include 'collapse' or 'converge.' The article also uses phrases like 'end of time' and 'ultimate fate,' which might overemphasize the implications of the study.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the new study suggesting a potential 'Big Crunch', but omits discussion of other cosmological models and their predictions for the universe's ultimate fate. While mentioning that scientists don't fully understand dark energy, it doesn't delve into the uncertainties and alternative hypotheses surrounding this topic in sufficient detail. The omission of counterarguments or alternative viewpoints weakens the overall analysis and could mislead readers into believing this single study definitively predicts the universe's end.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by contrasting the 'Big Crunch' scenario with an implicitly unending expansion. While acknowledging previous research suggesting a constant expansion, it doesn't thoroughly explore the nuances and complexities within the ongoing scientific debate regarding the universe's ultimate fate. The presentation could leave readers with an oversimplified understanding of the range of possibilities.