lemonde.fr
New York Fashion Week: A subdued event amid political polarization and economic uncertainty
The New York Fashion Week, held from September 11-16, saw a notable decrease in political statements, overshadowed by the assassination of a conservative influencer and the economic struggles of online wholesale distributors.
- How did economic factors affect the fashion week and its designers?
- The ongoing crisis in online wholesale distribution, exemplified by the difficulties faced by Ssense, a major distributor of emerging American designers, significantly impacted the industry. Increased US tariffs on Canadian imports further destabilized Ssense's finances and affected many American designers reliant on the platform for sales. Luxury e-commerce sites like Mytheresa and Farfetch are also struggling due to decreased global luxury consumption.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the current economic climate on American fashion?
- While the economic struggles of online distributors and general decrease in luxury spending pose challenges, the US tariffs on foreign imports could paradoxically benefit American designers. Reduced purchases of European luxury goods may drive consumers towards domestic brands, potentially creating a long-term shift in the market favoring American designers.
- What was the most significant impact of the assassination of Charlie Kirk on New York Fashion Week?
- The assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk the day before New York Fashion Week started created a somber atmosphere. Designers largely avoided political statements, unlike previous seasons, demonstrating the impact of the event on the industry's willingness to engage in political discourse. This contrasts sharply with the Emmy Awards, where political statements were more prominent.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of New York Fashion Week, acknowledging both the subdued political climate and the significant economic challenges facing the industry. While the murder of Charlie Kirk is mentioned, the focus remains on the fashion industry's response and the economic issues affecting designers. The inclusion of the Emmy Awards, where political statements were made, provides context but doesn't overshadow the fashion week analysis. However, the article's emphasis on the economic difficulties of online wholesale might inadvertently downplay the political implications, although this could be a consequence of focusing on a specific aspect of the event.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. Terms like "lourde" (heavy) to describe the atmosphere are subjective but do not overtly favor a particular viewpoint. The choice to focus on the absence of political statements as "timides encore" (more timid) could be interpreted as subtly critical, but it's also factually descriptive. The article avoids loaded language when discussing economic challenges, using terms like "graves difficultés financières" (serious financial difficulties) and "en recul" (in decline), which are relatively objective.
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of other potential factors influencing the subdued political climate at New York Fashion Week, such as broader societal shifts, internal industry pressures, or designers' individual choices unrelated to the murder. Further analysis of the economic situation could include a deeper look into the specifics of the tariffs and their impact on different designers and businesses. While this omission may be due to space constraints, it's important to note that it reduces the completeness of the analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The economic challenges faced by fashion businesses, particularly the impact of tariffs on Canadian distributors like SSENSE, indirectly relate to SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities). While not directly addressing inequality, the potential shift in consumer spending towards local designers due to tariffs could lessen the dominance of larger, international luxury brands, potentially promoting a more equitable distribution of economic benefits within the US fashion industry. However, the overall impact is uncertain and depends on various factors.