dw.com
Ocean Infinity Resumes Search for Missing MH370
Ocean Infinity, under a "no find, no fee" agreement with Malaysia, resumed its search for the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 on February 25, 2024, using autonomous underwater vehicles to scour a 15,000 square kilometer area off the coast of Western Australia.
- What is the immediate impact of Ocean Infinity resuming the search for MH370?
- Ocean Infinity, a US and UK-based marine exploration company, has resumed the search for Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, which vanished en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing on March 8, 2014. The Malaysian government announced the resumption on February 25, 2024. This follows a "no find, no fee" agreement, meaning Malaysia will only pay if the wreckage is found.
- What are the key elements of the agreement between the Malaysian government and Ocean Infinity regarding the renewed search?
- The renewed search covers a 15,000-square kilometer area off the coast of Perth, Australia, focusing on four key locations. Ocean Infinity is using the ship Armada 7806 and autonomous underwater vehicles. The previous search, also conducted by Ocean Infinity, ended in 2018 after a report indicated the plane deviated from its initial route.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this renewed search effort on aviation safety and investigation procedures?
- This renewed search reflects a persistent effort to resolve the mystery surrounding MH370's disappearance. The "no find, no fee" agreement demonstrates a calculated risk by Ocean Infinity, highlighting the enduring public interest and potential for significant future discoveries. Any new findings could significantly advance our understanding of the events leading to the disappearance.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the positive aspects of the renewed search, highlighting the optimism and proactivity of Ocean Infinity. The "no find, no fee" agreement is presented positively, focusing on the financial incentive for the company rather than the potential implications of a failed search. The headline and introduction focus on the restarting of the search, making it seem like a straightforward, positive event without dwelling on the inherent uncertainties and the many years that have passed since the disappearance.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but phrases like "duradouro mistério" (lasting mystery) and "a proatividade da Ocean Infinity" (Ocean Infinity's proactivity) could be perceived as slightly loaded, subtly influencing the reader's perception towards a sense of hopefulness and anticipation regarding the outcome of the renewed search. More neutral alternatives could be used, such as "ongoing mystery" and "Ocean Infinity's initiative.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the resumption of the search and the agreement with Ocean Infinity, but omits discussion of alternative theories regarding the disappearance of MH370 or critiques of previous search efforts. This omission might leave the reader with an incomplete understanding of the complexities surrounding the case and the controversies associated with it. While acknowledging space constraints, including some mention of alternative perspectives would improve the article's comprehensiveness.
Gender Bias
The article mentions only male figures (the Malaysian Transport Minister and researchers). While this might not be inherently biased, it would be improved by including perspectives from women involved in the search or impacted by the loss.