de.euronews.com
OECD Report: €416 Billion Global Counterfeit Trade, EU a Major Target
A new OECD report values global trade in counterfeit goods at over €416 billion, with the EU receiving nearly €99 billion worth, primarily from China, Turkey, and Hong Kong, via postal services, express couriers, and other methods, posing significant health and safety risks.
- What are the primary sources of counterfeit goods entering the EU, and what are the most common smuggling methods used?
- The report highlights China (over 50%), Turkey (22%), and Hong Kong (12%) as major sources of counterfeit goods destined for the EU. The trade fuels corruption, undermines consumer trust, and diverts resources from legitimate businesses. Common smuggling methods include postal services (58%), express couriers (17%), air freight (13%), and road transport (10%).
- What are the key findings of the OECD report on the global trade in counterfeit goods, and what are the immediate implications for the EU?
- A new OECD report reveals that counterfeit goods trade is valued at over €416 billion globally, representing 2.3% of world imports. The EU is a primary target, with nearly €99 billion (4.7%) of its imports being counterfeit, and 20 of the top 25 destinations for counterfeits are EU members. Germany leads in the value of seized counterfeit goods, with Berlin accounting for over 25% of the total.
- How have recent global crises impacted the trade in counterfeit goods, and what are the long-term implications for consumer safety and economic stability?
- The rise in counterfeit goods, particularly dangerous items like cosmetics, toys, car parts, and pharmaceuticals, poses significant health and safety risks. Recent global crises have exacerbated the problem by disrupting supply chains and shifting enforcement priorities, making risk management more complex. This necessitates stronger international cooperation and more effective enforcement strategies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the scale and economic consequences of the problem, highlighting the large sums of money involved and the significant percentage of imports affected. This framing could potentially prioritize the economic aspects over other considerations, such as public health and safety.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the economic impact and geographic distribution of counterfeit goods, but omits discussion of the consumer impact, such as health risks from counterfeit pharmaceuticals or the ethical implications of supporting organized crime through purchasing counterfeits. There is also no mention of efforts to combat the problem beyond the seizures reported.
Sustainable Development Goals
The report highlights the significant economic impact of counterfeit goods, undermining legitimate businesses and hindering sustainable production practices. The prevalence of counterfeit goods, especially in sectors like cosmetics and toys, poses serious health and safety risks, directly contradicting sustainable consumption and production patterns. The disruption of supply chains and shifting priorities in enforcing trade regulations due to global crises further exacerbate the issue.