sueddeutsche.de
Polizeiruf 110": Magdeburg School Shooting
A 17-year-old, Jeremy, armed with multiple weapons, shoots three people at a Magdeburg school before taking students and a teacher hostage, live-streaming the event online; the film explores his motivations and the broader societal context.
- What were the immediate consequences of Jeremy's actions at the school?
- Jeremy's actions resulted in three deaths and multiple students and a teacher being held hostage. His live-streamed actions generated a large police response and widespread public attention.
- What are the film's strengths and weaknesses in portraying this sensitive topic?
- The film's strengths lie in its avoidance of glorifying the perpetrator and its focus on the victims' suffering. However, its attempt to avoid clear-cut blame leads to a somewhat contrived and unrealistic ending, undermining its otherwise realistic portrayal.
- How does the film portray Jeremy's motivations, and what broader societal issues does it explore?
- The film suggests Jeremy's radicalization stemmed from an online parallel world, but it also explores the question of whether this fully explains his actions, leaving open the possibility of deeper societal factors. The film emphasizes the victims' perspectives.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article focuses on the perpetrator's motivations and the victims' suffering, providing a balanced perspective. However, the description of the ending as 'rather contrived' suggests a potential framing bias towards criticizing the film's attempt at nuanced portrayal, potentially overlooking the deliberate artistic choices made to avoid simplistic conclusions.
Language Bias
The language used is mostly neutral and descriptive, avoiding sensationalism. Terms like "belastender Krimi" (distressing crime thriller) are appropriately descriptive rather than judgmental. However, words like "konstruiert" (contrived) to describe the ending might subtly influence the reader's opinion.
Bias by Omission
The review doesn't discuss the role of the police investigation in detail, focusing more on the perpetrator's psychology and the film's atmosphere. While not necessarily biased, this omission could limit a complete understanding of the film's narrative.
False Dichotomy
The review avoids a false dichotomy by acknowledging that Jeremy might be both perpetrator and victim. However, the critique of the ending as unrealistic versus contrived hints at a simplified eitheor view of the film's success.
Sustainable Development Goals
The movie depicts a school shooting, highlighting the negative impact on the safety and well-being of students and the disruption of the educational environment. The film explores the potential root causes of the violence, indirectly touching upon the need for improved mental health support within educational settings and a safer learning environment.