lexpress.fr
Portugal Bans Smartphones in Schools to Improve Learning and Socialization
Portugal banned smartphones in primary schools and some middle schools starting in 2025, based on a trial showing improved school environment and decreased bullying; exceptions apply for students with learning or health needs, and for phones used solely for family contact.
- What are the immediate impacts of Portugal's smartphone ban in schools, based on the pilot program's results?
- Portugal banned smartphones in primary schools and some middle schools starting in 2025, based on a successful trial showing improved school environment and decreased bullying. Exceptions are made for students with Portuguese language difficulties or health needs, and for phones used solely for contacting families.
- What are the potential long-term effects of this ban on students' academic performance, social skills, and overall well-being?
- This initiative reflects a growing international trend. The positive results in Portugal, similar to those in the Netherlands, suggest future policy shifts in other countries facing similar challenges regarding smartphone use and its impact on youth development and learning. Further research could focus on long-term impacts on academic achievement.
- How do the observed improvements in school climate, such as reduced bullying and improved socialization, relate to the use of smartphones?
- The ban follows trials in hundreds of schools showing a 60% improvement rate in school environment according to headmasters. Specifically, primary schools reported a 31% decrease in bullying, while secondary schools saw a decrease of over 50%. This is significant because schools are key social environments.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction immediately present the smartphone ban as a successful initiative, highlighting positive outcomes like reduced bullying and improved socialization. This framing, while supported by data, might preemptively shape the reader's interpretation and overshadow potential drawbacks or complexities. The emphasis on positive statistics from the pilot program strengthens this bias.
Language Bias
The article uses predominantly neutral language. However, phrases like "amélioration de l'environnement scolaire" (improvement of the school environment) and "meilleure socialisation" (better socialization) carry slightly positive connotations. While not overtly biased, more precise and data-driven descriptions could enhance objectivity. For instance, instead of "better socialization", the article could specify the observed increase in peer interaction or collaborative activities.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the positive impacts of the smartphone ban in Portugal, citing improvements in school environment, bullying reduction, and socialization. However, it omits potential negative consequences, such as the challenges faced by students who rely on smartphones for communication, access to information, or support due to disabilities or language barriers. While exceptions are mentioned, the extent and effectiveness of these accommodations are not explored. The article also lacks counterarguments or alternative viewpoints on the ban's efficacy, limiting a comprehensive understanding of the issue.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified eitheor scenario: smartphones are detrimental to learning and social interaction, therefore banning them is the solution. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of smartphone use in education, acknowledging exceptions but not deeply analyzing the potential for balanced and responsible smartphone integration in schools.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ban on smartphones in Portuguese schools aims to improve learning and student relationships. A trial period showed positive effects, including decreased bullying, improved socialization, and better use of school resources. This directly supports SDG 4 (Quality Education) by creating a more conducive learning environment and fostering better social interaction among students, which is crucial for holistic education.