elpais.com
Privatization of AI and Science
Analysis of the privatization of AI research, focusing on the implications of California's vetoed AI bill and the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Google DeepMind employees.
Spanish
Spain
TechnologyLabour MarketScienceAiGovernmentCorporations
GoogleDeepmindIsomorphic LabsReal Academia Sueca De CienciasEmbl-Ebi
Gavin NewsomDavid BakerDemis HassabisJohn M. JumperKatharina Pistor
- What is the author's critique of DeepMind's AlphaFold2?
- While AlphaFold2's source code is publicly available, DeepMind holds patents, suggesting that the company retains ultimate control over its use, despite utilizing publicly funded data.
- What historical examples does the author use to support their argument?
- The author criticizes governments for readily handing over publicly funded research to private companies without ensuring public oversight and control over its application.
- What was California Governor Gavin Newsom's role in the AI safety debate?
- California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed an AI safety bill in September, highlighting concerns about the lack of corporate accountability for potential AI harms.
- How did the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry relate to the privatization of science?
- The 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry awarded to Google DeepMind employees legitimizes the privatization of scientific research, raising questions about accessibility and public benefit.
- What is the author's main argument regarding the relationship between government, corporations, and scientific progress?
- The article argues that private corporations often leverage publicly funded research, prioritizing profit over human progress and monopolizing scientific knowledge through patents and trade secrets.