dw.com
Pro-Assad Forces Lose Control of Aleppo to HTS Rebels
Pro-Assad forces have lost control of Aleppo to Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and allied jihadist rebels for the first time since 2012, following a major HTS offensive that began on November 27th and resulted in over 320 deaths, including 44 civilians.
- What are the immediate consequences of the pro-Assad forces losing control of Aleppo to HTS and allied rebels?
- The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) reports that pro-Assad forces have lost complete control of Aleppo to Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and allied jihadist rebels, marking the first time since 2012 that regime forces have lost control of the city. This loss follows a major HTS offensive launched on November 27th, resulting in over 320 deaths, including 44 civilians, in the most intense fighting in the region since 2020. The Syrian army responded by deploying reinforcements and conducting airstrikes in Hama, killing four and injuring 54 civilians.
- What factors contributed to the recent major offensive launched by HTS and its allies, leading to the loss of Aleppo?
- The fall of Aleppo to HTS and allied jihadists represents a significant strategic shift in the Syrian civil war, illustrating the ongoing instability and the rebels' capacity to regain territory. This development follows a major offensive by HTS, highlighting their strength and the challenges facing the Assad regime. The increased intensity of fighting, with Russian airstrikes also reported, underscores the involvement of external actors and the complexities of the conflict.
- What are the long-term implications of this strategic shift in the Syrian conflict, considering the involvement of external actors and the potential for further escalation?
- The loss of Aleppo likely signals a renewed escalation of the conflict, with potentially significant regional implications. The Assad regime's weakened position may embolden other rebel groups and potentially destabilize neighboring countries. International efforts towards a political solution will face an even greater challenge given this significant military setback for the Syrian government.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the losses suffered by the Syrian government, highlighting their loss of control in Aleppo. The headline (if any) likely would reinforce this perspective. The sequencing of events also prioritizes the opposition's actions and their reported gains.
Language Bias
The language used tends to describe the opposition groups as "rebels" or "insurgents" which could imply a negative connotation. Neutral alternatives could include "opposition groups" or "armed groups". The description of government actions as "sending reinforcements" could be perceived as a neutral description of a military action.
Bias by Omission
The report focuses heavily on the conflict from the perspective of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) and other opposition sources. While government statements are mentioned regarding military actions, there is a lack of independent verification or alternative perspectives on the events, specifically regarding the casualty figures and the extent of territorial control.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a somewhat simplified picture of the conflict as a fight between the Syrian government and opposition groups, potentially overlooking the complexities of alliances, motivations and the involvement of external actors. The article doesn't delve into the nuances of the various factions involved in the conflict.