repubblica.it
Renewable Energy Saves \$57 Billion in 2024
A new report by the International Renewable Energy Agency (Irena) reveals that renewable energy saved the world \$57 billion in fossil fuel costs in 2024 due to 582 gigawatts of new capacity, with 91% of new green plants cheaper than fossil fuel alternatives.
- What were the immediate economic benefits of renewable energy in 2024, and how significant were they globally?
- In 2024, renewable energy sources saved the world \$57 billion in fossil fuel costs, according to a new report by the International Renewable Energy Agency (Irena). This saving resulted from 582 gigawatts of new renewable energy capacity installed last year, with 91% of new green energy plants proving cheaper than fossil fuel alternatives.
- What are the main obstacles hindering the global transition to renewable energy, and how do these obstacles vary across different regions?
- The cost savings are significant: solar photovoltaic was 41% cheaper than the most affordable fossil fuel, and onshore wind power was 53% cheaper. Onshore wind was the most competitive source, costing \$0.034/kWh, followed by solar at \$0.043/kWh. Considering all active installations, \$467 billion in fossil fuel spending was avoided.
- What are the key technological advancements and policy measures that could further accelerate the cost reduction and integration of renewable energy systems in both developed and developing economies?
- While renewable energy offers substantial economic and strategic advantages—reducing reliance on international fuel markets and stabilizing prices—challenges remain. Geopolitical tensions, tariffs, raw material shortages, and supply chain bottlenecks, particularly in China, are increasing costs. In Europe and North America, permitting delays and grid limitations hinder progress. Conversely, regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, with faster technological learning, may see accelerated cost reductions, though high capital costs remain a barrier in many emerging economies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article is framed positively towards renewable energy, emphasizing its economic benefits and technological progress. The headline (not provided, but inferred from the text) likely highlights the cost savings, setting a positive tone from the start. The use of quotes from the Irena director further reinforces this positive framing. While acknowledging challenges, the article predominantly presents the narrative of renewable energy's success and future potential, potentially downplaying the significance of the obstacles faced.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral but occasionally leans towards positive phrasing when describing renewable energy. For example, terms like "clear path toward sustainable and secure energy" and "accelerated reduction of costs" are used. While not overtly biased, these phrases convey an optimistic tone that could be softened for improved objectivity. More neutral alternatives would be 'path towards sustainable energy' and 'reduction of costs'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the economic benefits and technological advancements of renewable energy, but omits discussion of potential negative environmental impacts like land use changes or the lifecycle emissions of renewable energy technologies. While acknowledging challenges to adoption, it doesn't delve into potential social or political consequences of the energy transition, such as job displacement in fossil fuel industries or potential conflicts over resource allocation. The omission of these counterpoints could lead to an incomplete understanding of the overall implications of a shift to renewables.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified picture by contrasting renewables with fossil fuels as a clear-cut choice. While highlighting the cost advantages of renewables, it doesn't fully explore the complexities of a smooth transition, such as the need for reliable backup power sources and the infrastructure upgrades required to handle intermittent renewable energy generation. The presentation implies a straightforward replacement of one energy source with another, neglecting the multifaceted nature of the transition.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights significant cost reductions in renewable energy sources (solar, wind) compared to fossil fuels, leading to $57 billion in savings in 2024. This directly contributes to SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) by making clean energy more accessible and economically viable. The decrease in renewable energy costs is a major step towards transitioning to sustainable energy systems.