Repubblica's Climate Atlas: Evidence and Solutions

Repubblica's Climate Atlas: Evidence and Solutions

repubblica.it

Repubblica's Climate Atlas: Evidence and Solutions

Repubblica's new climate atlas, released tomorrow, uses scientific data to explain the causes and consequences of climate change, including extreme weather, economic impacts, and health risks, and offers solutions for mitigation and adaptation.

Italian
Italy
Climate ChangeScienceSustainabilityGlobal WarmingEnvironmental IssuesClimate CrisisSolutions
RepubblicaLimes
James WattJoseph FourierSebastião SalgadoMarcel ProustLucio Caracciolo
What are the key effects of climate change highlighted in Repubblica's new climate atlas?
Repubblica newspaper is releasing an atlas on climate change, detailing the effects of global warming and offering solutions. The atlas uses scientific evidence to explain rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and health issues linked to climate change. It also explores economic and geopolitical consequences, highlighting potential costs and power dynamics.
How does the atlas explain the connection between climate change and economic instability?
The atlas connects rising global temperatures to increased frequency of floods, emergence of new diseases, economic downturns, changes in food taste, mass migration, and a perceived lack of urgency regarding climate change. These connections are supported by data and scientific research presented in the publication.
What solutions to climate change are proposed in the atlas, and what are their potential impacts?
The atlas emphasizes that the future is not predetermined; solutions like emission reduction and reforestation are discussed. The publication suggests that understanding the economic and geopolitical implications of climate change is crucial for effective mitigation and adaptation strategies. The atlas aims to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and public perception.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The framing of the article strongly emphasizes the urgency and severity of climate change. The headline question format and the repeated use of rhetorical questions that imply a negative answer create a sense of impending crisis. The inclusion of a free magazine on climate change further reinforces this framing. While the urgency is backed by scientific evidence, this intense framing might lead to alarmist interpretations. The positive concluding statement about solutions offers a counterbalance, but the overall tone leans towards a negative and urgent narrative.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral, relying on facts and figures from scientific sources. The article avoids overtly charged language. However, phrases like "the Earth is suffering" and descriptions of potential economic catastrophes can be considered emotionally charged, influencing reader perception.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the scientific evidence of climate change, but omits discussion of dissenting viewpoints or alternative theories. While acknowledging limitations of space, the lack of counterarguments might leave readers with an incomplete picture of the complexities surrounding climate change debates. The omission of economic arguments against drastic climate action could also be considered a bias by omission.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a clear dichotomy between human activity causing climate change and the need for immediate action to mitigate it. While this simplifies a complex issue, the framing isn't entirely false as the scientific consensus strongly supports this position. The omission of nuances within the scientific debate could be seen as a form of false dichotomy, however.

Sustainable Development Goals

Climate Action Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights the negative impacts of climate change, including extreme heat, frequent floods, new diseases, economic downturns, food quality loss, increased migration, and a lack of urgency in addressing the crisis. It directly connects these issues to human activities and rising global temperatures. The article also emphasizes the need for immediate action, such as emission reduction and reforestation, to mitigate further damage. This directly addresses SDG 13 (Climate Action) and its targets to strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters, and to integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning.