dw.com
RSF Forms Parallel Government in Sudan, Exacerbating Humanitarian Crisis
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan, led by Mohamed Hassan al-Taischi, formed a parallel government in February 2024, intensifying the conflict with the Sudanese military under General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, which already displaced over 14 million and caused tens of thousands of deaths, creating the world's largest humanitarian crisis.
- What is the immediate impact of the RSF forming a parallel government in Sudan?
- The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan, led by Mohamed Hassan al-Taischi, have formed a parallel government, declaring it the "government of peace and unity." This follows a February agreement in Nairobi, Kenya, and directly challenges the Sudanese military government under General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, which has vowed to continue fighting until it regains full control of the country. The conflict has caused a major humanitarian crisis.
- What are the underlying causes of the ongoing conflict between the Sudanese military and the RSF?
- The RSF's establishment of a rival government intensifies the ongoing power struggle between the RSF and the Sudanese military. This conflict has already displaced over 14 million people and caused tens of thousands of deaths, creating the world's largest humanitarian crisis. The division of territory, with the military controlling the north and east and the RSF controlling much of the south and west, exacerbates the instability and violence.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of this conflict for the stability and development of Sudan?
- The long-term consequences of the Sudanese conflict include widespread infrastructure damage requiring extensive repairs, and the displacement of millions of people. The RSF's formalization of its control over significant parts of the country suggests a protracted conflict, potentially leading to further humanitarian suffering and prolonged instability. The return of some 1.3 million people to Khartoum and surrounding areas, while positive, highlights the immense scale of the reconstruction challenge.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the humanitarian crisis and the violence, which is understandable given its severity. However, this emphasis might overshadow other important aspects of the conflict, such as the political motivations of the involved parties and potential long-term consequences. The headline (if any) and introduction would significantly influence this.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual, relying on reporting from various news agencies. While terms like "blutiger Machtkampf" (bloody power struggle) are used, these are descriptions of the situation, not loaded language promoting a particular viewpoint.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the conflict and humanitarian crisis, but omits details about the underlying political and economic factors that contributed to the conflict. There is no mention of international involvement beyond the UNHCR and UNDP, and the perspectives of various international actors are absent. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, the lack of broader context could mislead readers.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between the military and the RSF, while the situation on the ground is likely more nuanced with various factions and actors involved. This simplification might oversimplify the complexity of the conflict for the reader.
Sustainable Development Goals
The conflict in Sudan has caused the largest hunger crisis in the world, with millions displaced and essential infrastructure destroyed, leading to widespread food insecurity. The quote "Der Konflikt im Sudan hat die größte Hunger- und Flüchtlingskrise der Welt ausgelöst" directly supports this.