elmundo.es
Russia's potential 2028 aggression: A geopolitical risk assessment based on Masala's "If Russia Wins
Carlo Masala's book, "If Russia Wins," simulates a 2028 scenario where Russia, after a 2026 truce in Ukraine, escalates aggression against Estonia, challenging NATO's resolve and highlighting Europe's military dependence on the US.
- What are the immediate consequences of Russia's potential invasion of Estonia in 2028, as depicted in Masala's book?
- The simulated invasion triggers Estonia's invocation of NATO's Article 5, demanding a military response. However, the response is uncertain due to internal divisions within NATO regarding commitment to military action against a nuclear power. This creates a potential geopolitical crisis, directly impacting transatlantic relations and the credibility of collective security mechanisms.
- How does Masala's scenario illustrate the broader geopolitical implications of a potential Russian victory in Ukraine?
- Masala's book highlights the potential for emboldened revisionist powers, like Russia and China, to exploit perceived Western weakness. The simulated actions—ranging from escalating tensions in the South China Sea to covert sabotage within Europe—demonstrate a calculated strategy to undermine the existing international order and test the resolve of Western alliances.
- What are the long-term implications and underlying systemic issues exposed by the scenarios presented in Masala's book?
- The book suggests a potential erosion of Western military capabilities and political will. Europe's reliance on the US for crucial military infrastructure and the declining public support for military intervention represent systemic weaknesses. The narrative underscores the risk that a lack of decisive response could embolden authoritarian regimes and further destabilize the global order, mirroring historical precedents where appeasement ultimately failed.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review focuses on the potential geopolitical consequences described in Masala's book, "If Russia Wins." The framing emphasizes the potential challenges to NATO and the West's resolve, highlighting the risks of inaction and the potential for Russia to gain strategic advantages. While the book's scenarios are presented, the review's focus on the potential consequences shapes the reader's understanding towards a concern about the West's response capacity and willingness to defend its allies.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but terms like "apasionante" (passionate) and references to Churchill and Gramsci might subtly influence the reader's perception. The description of certain figures, such as Carl Schmitt, as "tristemente admirado" (sadly admired) carries a clear negative connotation. More neutral language could replace these subjective terms. For example, instead of "sadly admired", one could use "controversial figure.
Bias by Omission
The review omits discussion of potential counterarguments or alternative interpretations of the scenarios presented in Masala's book. The economic analysis is limited to a simple comparison of GDPs and populations, which overlooks the complexity of economic factors in warfare. It also doesn't mention Russia's internal political landscape or the potential for internal resistance to further aggression.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between a strong, unified Western response and a passive acceptance of Russian aggression. The nuances of various countries' potential responses and the spectrum of possible outcomes are not fully explored. The implication that a lack of strong Western response is equivalent to giving 'unambiguous signals to authoritarian regimes' oversimplifies a complex situation with potential for other interpretations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The book describes a scenario where Russia escalates its aggression, violating international law and undermining the rules-based international order. This directly impacts the SDG 16, Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, by depicting a failure of international institutions to prevent conflict and uphold justice. The scenario highlights the challenges to maintaining peace and security in a world with rising authoritarianism and disregard for international norms.