dw.com
SCO Summit: Iran's 'Look East' Policy Amidst Geopolitical Shifts
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in China, attended by over 20 leaders including those from Russia and India, marks Iran's strengthening ties with Russia and China, driven by strained relations with the West and a desire to counter a perceived US-led anti-Iran axis.
- What is the immediate impact of Iran's increased engagement with the SCO and BRICS?
- Iran's membership in the SCO and BRICS solidifies its 'look east' policy, countering Western influence and diversifying its geopolitical alliances. This shift is evidenced by increased military and economic cooperation with Russia and China, including procuring Chinese equipment to rebuild its air defense system.
- How does Iran's engagement with the SCO and BRICS impact its relations with Middle Eastern rivals?
- Despite its closer ties with Russia and China, Iran is simultaneously improving relations with Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia and the UAE. This rapprochement is partly a response to US and Israeli actions against Iran, prompting Gulf states to prioritize independent diplomacy for regional stability.
- What are the long-term implications of Iran's 'look east' policy for regional and global power dynamics?
- Iran's strengthened relationship with the SCO and BRICS may lead to a more multipolar global order, reducing Western influence in the Middle East. However, internal factions within Iran still debate the extent of engagement with Russia and China, suggesting potential future shifts in policy depending on domestic political developments.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of Iran's foreign policy shift towards Russia and China, acknowledging both the motivations and potential drawbacks. While it highlights Iran's rapprochement with these powers as a response to strained relations with the West, it also notes internal dissent within Iran regarding this approach. The inclusion of multiple expert perspectives contributes to a nuanced presentation, although the framing could benefit from explicit acknowledgement of potential biases within these perspectives.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. While terms like "reckless adventurism" are used, they are attributed to specific sources (ECFR) rather than presented as the author's own opinion. The use of quotes from experts maintains objectivity, although the selection of experts themselves might reflect a bias towards certain viewpoints.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including perspectives from US and Israeli officials to provide a more complete picture of their perspectives on Iran's actions and motivations. Additionally, exploring the potential economic consequences for Iran from its increased reliance on Russia and China would provide greater context. However, given the length of the article, these omissions are likely due to practical constraints rather than intentional bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses Iran's increased engagement with the SCO and BRICS, aiming to counter the US-dominated global order and foster regional stability. This directly relates to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) by promoting multilateralism and peaceful conflict resolution. The improved ties between Iran and its Gulf neighbors, facilitated by independent diplomacy, also contribute to regional peace and security.