lemonde.fr
SCPI and 'SCPI en démembrement': Retirement Investment Strategies for High-Income Earners
French SCPIs offer an average 4.72% return in 2024, but high-income pre-retirees may prefer 'SCPI en démembrement', buying only the bare ownership (nue-propriété) for a discount (22-35%) and deferred tax benefits, generating tax-free retirement income.
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of using SCPIs as a retirement investment for high-income earners nearing retirement?
- French SCPIs (Sociétés Civiles de Placement Immobilier), a common retirement investment, yield an average 4.72% return in 2024, according to Aspim. While some recent SCPI valuations decreased, long-term investment potential remains. However, pre-retirement, high income earners may prefer alternatives to avoid immediate tax implications on SCPI distributions.
- How does investing in 'SCPI en démembrement' differ from traditional SCPI investment, and what are its specific tax implications?
- The article highlights SCPIs' role in retirement income but notes that their tax implications might be undesirable for high-income earners nearing retirement. An alternative is investing in 'SCPI en démembrement', purchasing only the bare ownership (nue-propriété), avoiding immediate income and taxes. This strategy allows for future tax-free income upon retirement.
- What are the potential long-term financial and tax benefits of using 'SCPI en démembrement' as a retirement savings strategy, considering the discount on the purchase price and deferred tax implications?
- Investing in SCPI bare ownership offers a tax-advantaged strategy for pre-retirees with high incomes. The bare ownership allows for a discount (around 22% for five years, 35% for ten) and defers tax implications until retirement, generating a tax-free supplement to retirement income. This approach leverages the long-term appreciation potential of SCPIs while mitigating current tax burdens.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article is framed positively towards SCPI investments, particularly those with deferred usufruct. The headline (not provided) likely emphasizes the benefits, while the introductory paragraph highlights the average return rate. The inclusion of expert quotes supporting SCPIs further strengthens this positive framing. The potential downsides are mentioned, but receive less emphasis.
Language Bias
The article uses largely neutral language. However, phrases like "déboires récents" (recent setbacks) are slightly negative but accurate. The description of the 4.72% return as a benefit can be considered subtly biased, while the discussion of tax implications is presented factually. Overall, the language is more promotional than strictly neutral.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on SCPIs as a retirement investment, but omits discussion of alternative retirement investment options. While acknowledging the recent struggles of some SCPIs, it doesn't explore the reasons behind these struggles in detail, nor does it compare SCPIs to other investment vehicles with similar risk profiles. The long-term nature of the investment is emphasized, but the potential for long-term losses isn't fully explored.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the choice as either investing in traditional SCPIs immediately or investing in SCPIs with usufruct deferred until retirement. It doesn't explore other investment strategies or timeframes.
Sustainable Development Goals
Investing in SCPIs, particularly through démembrement, can help reduce inequality by providing a retirement income supplement for individuals who may not have sufficient savings. The démembrement strategy allows for tax advantages and potentially lower entry costs, making this investment option more accessible.