dw.com
Serbia: 20 Arrested on Charges of Threatening Constitutional Order
At least 20 people have been arrested in Serbia in the past eight months on charges of "violently overthrowing the constitutional order," stemming from various protests; lawyers argue this broadly interpreted charge suppresses free speech.
- What are the specific charges and consequences faced by individuals arrested in Serbia for alleged threats to the constitutional order in the last eight months?
- In Serbia, at least 20 individuals have been arrested in the past eight months under suspicion of "violently overthrowing the constitutional order." Recent cases include a Novi Sad student arrested after a June 28th protest and a Belgrade University student, Stefan Tomić, accused of planning violent actions against state institutions and media outlets.
- How do lawyers and legal experts assess the application and interpretation of Article 309 of the Criminal Code, particularly concerning its impact on freedom of expression?
- These arrests, often preceding protests, involve accusations based on intercepted conversations and alleged plans for violent actions against government buildings and media. The charges, under Article 309 of the Criminal Code, carry sentences of up to eight years, raising concerns about free speech restrictions.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this broad interpretation of the law regarding the suppression of dissent and the exercise of fundamental rights in Serbia?
- The broad interpretation of Article 309, allowing charges for actions not directly related to overthrowing the constitutional order, is criticized by lawyers. This raises concerns about potential misuse to suppress dissent and limits on freedom of expression, particularly given cases where charges seem disproportionate to the actions.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative by heavily emphasizing the arrests and charges against individuals suspected of plotting to overthrow the government. The headline and introductory paragraphs immediately focus on the arrests, creating a sense of urgency and highlighting the severity of the alleged crimes. While the article mentions opposing viewpoints from lawyers, this is presented later and with less emphasis, potentially influencing the reader to perceive the actions of the arrested individuals as more threatening than they might actually be. The selection and order of events presented further contribute to this framing.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language, such as "nasilno rušenje ustavnog poretka" (violent overthrow of the constitutional order) and "nasilan upad" (violent intrusion) repeatedly, which emphasizes the severity of the alleged actions. Words like "plotting," "suspects," and "alleged crimes" contribute to a negative portrayal of those arrested. The use of terms like "egzil" (exile) also adds emotional weight. While the article does include counter-arguments from lawyers, the use of charged language in the initial presentation may prejudice the reader before those alternative views are presented.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on arrests and accusations related to the charge of violently overthrowing the constitutional order, but it omits analysis of the political context surrounding these events, such as public sentiment towards the government and the reasons behind the protests. There is no mention of any counter-arguments or perspectives from the government's side regarding the protests and arrests. The article also lacks details about the legal proceedings and the evidence used in the arrests. This omission limits the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion on the fairness and necessity of the actions taken by law enforcement.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as either a legitimate exercise of constitutional rights or an attempt to violently overthrow the government. It neglects the possibility of peaceful protest that escalates into violence or actions taken by individuals who don't represent the majority view of protesters. The article doesn't thoroughly explore the spectrum of motives and actions within the protests themselves.
Gender Bias
The article mentions a female professor, Marija Vasić, among those arrested, but does not focus on her gender in relation to the charges or treatment. While no overt gender bias is apparent, the lack of specific details regarding gender representation within the overall group of arrested individuals makes comprehensive gender bias analysis difficult.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the arrest and prosecution of at least 20 individuals in the past eight months on charges related to "violently overthrowing the constitutional order." These arrests, particularly those surrounding protests, raise concerns about restrictions on freedom of expression and the potential for misuse of legal processes to suppress dissent. The wide interpretation of the law, as pointed out by the defense lawyers, allows for the targeting of individuals and groups expressing opposition to the government, thus undermining the principles of justice and strong institutions.