dw.com
Serbia's Media: Minimizing Srebrenica Genocide
Serbian media, particularly Informer and Happy TV, consistently minimize the Srebrenica genocide by featuring convicted war criminals as analysts, deflecting attention with counter-narratives, and exploiting anniversaries for political campaigns, thereby hindering reconciliation and justice.
- How do prominent Serbian media outlets contribute to the downplaying of war crimes committed in the 1990s, and what are the immediate consequences?
- In Serbia, convicted war criminals are frequently featured as analysts on prominent television and in newspapers, such as Informer, minimizing the significance of war crimes committed in the 1990s. This is especially evident around anniversaries like July 11th, designated by the UN as the International Day of Remembrance of the Srebrenica Genocide. The media often deflects attention by highlighting alleged crimes committed by others.
- What narrative techniques are employed by Serbian media to manipulate the historical context of the Srebrenica genocide, and how effective are these strategies?
- This media strategy employs narratives that downplay the Srebrenica massacre's scale, selectively present data, deny historical facts, and promote nationalist sentiments. It aims to rehabilitate the reputations of war criminals, discredit those advocating for justice, and undermine the authority of institutions dealing with war crimes. This pattern has intensified since the 2012 rise of the Serbian Progressive Party.
- What are the long-term societal and political implications of the persistent denial and minimization of the Srebrenica genocide in Serbia, and what potential future consequences might arise?
- The ongoing manipulation of historical narratives about Srebrenica fuels a cycle of unresolved conflict. The normalization of war criminal glorification, as seen in murals and chants like "Knife, wire, Srebrenica," indicates that the past remains a potent political tool. This unresolved history hinders reconciliation and prevents a full reckoning with the consequences of past atrocities.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article consistently emphasizes the downplaying of the Srebrenica genocide in Serbian media through the actions of the government and pro-government media. Headlines and prominent placement of information about those minimizing the genocide, alongside the downplaying of the scale of the event itself, heavily influences reader interpretation towards a narrative that minimizes Serbian responsibility. The inclusion of counterpoints such as the views of Prof. Milivojević and alternative media coverage attempts to balance this, but the overall framing still leans heavily toward highlighting the bias.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language when describing actions of the Serbian media, using words like "relativization," "manipulation," and "downplaying." While these words accurately reflect the actions described, they carry a strong negative connotation. More neutral alternatives could be used, such as "minimizing," "selective reporting," or "biased presentation." The repeated use of "pro-government" or "pro-Milošević" media also carries a strong connotation, although it is factually accurate.
Bias by Omission
The article highlights the omission of context regarding the Srebrenica genocide in Serbian media, particularly the lack of coverage in pro-Milošević media during July 1995 and the selective presentation of facts that downplay the scale of the genocide. The article also notes the lack of official information on perpetrators of the 2015 Potočari incident, which is presented as an attempt on Vučić's life by tabloids. This omission prevents a complete understanding of the events and allows for biased narratives to flourish.
False Dichotomy
The article does not explicitly present a false dichotomy, but the focus on minimizing Serbian culpability and emphasizing the actions of others creates an implicit false choice, suggesting that acknowledging Serbian involvement negates the actions of others. This simplifies a complex historical event.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the negative impact of the media's portrayal of war criminals and the downplaying of the Srebrenica genocide on peace, justice, and strong institutions in Serbia. The normalization of war crimes through media narratives, the glorification of convicted war criminals, and the lack of accountability undermine efforts towards reconciliation and the establishment of strong institutions based on justice and accountability. The manipulation of historical narratives prevents a truthful reckoning with the past and hinders efforts to build a society founded on peace and justice.