nrc.nl
Shell vs. Milieudefensie: Climate Case Verdict
The Shell-Milieudefensie climate case is back in court, with a crucial decision looming that will impact corporate climate accountability and global climate action.
Dutch
Netherlands
JusticeClimate ChangeNetherlandsEnergy SecurityEnvironmentLawsuitClimateCorporation
ShellMilieudefensieNautadutilhUrgendaVno-Ncw
Freerk VermeulenRoger CoxAl GoreFrans EvertsWael Sawan
- What are Shell's plans if they lose the appeal?
- If Shell loses again, they'll likely appeal to the Supreme Court, potentially delaying enforcement. This could be viewed as a delay tactic, but Shell maintains they're already acting in line with the ruling, although they may delay significant measures until the last minute.
- What are the broader implications of this case's outcome?
- A win for Milieudefensie could set a precedent for other climate cases globally, increasing pressure on corporations. A Shell victory, however, might embolden other companies and hinder further climate litigation.
- What is Shell's main argument against the court's ruling?
- Shell's appeal argues that the court shouldn't impose such regulations on companies; that's the role of politicians. They disagree on the speed and extent of oil companies' climate responsibilities.
- What is the core issue in the Shell-Milieudefensie climate case?
- The Shell-Milieudefensie climate case, dating back to 2018, challenges Shell's insufficient decarbonization efforts. Milieudefensie initially won, imposing a significant CO2 reduction mandate on Shell, leading to Shell's appeal.
- What are the potential consequences of the court's upcoming decision?
- The court's decision will have major implications, regardless of the outcome. A win for Milieudefensie reinforces the accountability of large corporations, while a Shell victory would be a setback for climate activism.