elmundo.es
Spain's Pacifist Past and Surkov's Authoritarian Future
The author reflects on avoiding military service in Spain's 1990s pacifist climate, contrasting it with Surkov's prediction of a future alliance between Europe, Russia, and the US against the 'Global South', requiring a shift toward authoritarianism.
- How did the author's personal experience avoiding military service reflect broader societal attitudes and their consequences?
- This perspective, prevalent in the 1990s, contributed to a widespread disregard for the military and a pacifist stance, hindering Spain's preparedness for current geopolitical challenges. Aznar's decision to abolish military service reinforced this attitude, which persists today, impacting Spain's response to the need for rearming demanded by the EU.
- What immediate impacts resulted from Spain's abolishment of military service and the prevailing pacifist sentiment of the 1990s?
- The author, like Abascal, avoided military service due to a study extension granted before its abolishment by Aznar. This reflects a prevalent attitude among Spain's affluent middle class viewing military service as irrelevant, a relic of Franco's regime. A consequential underestimation of geopolitical risks followed.
- What are the potential long-term geopolitical implications of Surkov's prediction of a future alliance between Europe, Russia, and the US, and what role might 'europutinists' and 'eurotrumpists' play?
- Surkov's interview with L'Express highlights a potential future alliance between Europe, Russia, and the US against a rising 'Global South'. This would necessitate a shift towards authoritarianism in Europe, facilitated by 'europutinists' and 'eurotrumpists', and a moderation of Russia's neo-zarism. This scenario underscores the long-term impact of past underestimation of military and geopolitical significance.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the author's avoidance of military service as representative of a broader societal attitude, implicitly judging those who served and drawing a connection between this attitude and the current political landscape. The use of terms like "balas perdidas" (lost bullets) to describe those who served paints a negative picture of military service. The headline (if any) and introduction would likely reinforce this framing.
Language Bias
The author uses loaded language, such as "pacifismo tramposo" (deceitful pacifism) and describes the left's attitude as "odio a EEUU y al libre mercado" (hatred of the US and free market). These terms are highly charged and lack neutrality. More neutral alternatives could be "opposition to US foreign policy" or "criticism of neoliberal economics". The description of Surkov as an "escurridizo" (slippery) individual is also subjective.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the author's personal experience and perspective regarding military service and the political climate in Spain, neglecting other perspectives on the necessity of military preparedness and the geopolitical situation. It omits discussion of potential counter-arguments to the author's claims about pacifism, the Spanish military, and the geopolitical analysis offered by Surkov. The piece also lacks diverse voices and data to support its assertions.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between a naive pacifism and the necessity of rearming, overlooking the spectrum of views on defense and foreign policy. It implies that supporting the EU's call for rearming is the only logical stance, disregarding other considerations like the economic impact or the potential for escalation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the consequences of pacifism and disarmament, particularly the unpreparedness for current geopolitical challenges. The author criticizes the lack of military preparedness and the naive belief in lasting peace, highlighting the potential for conflict and the need for stronger institutions to address these challenges. This directly relates to SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.