sueddeutsche.de
Stern-Preis Awards Highlight Investigative Journalism and Societal Issues
The Stern-Preis, formerly the Nannen Preis, awarded journalists for work including a documentary on the Yazidi genocide, an investigation of a Telegram sexual violence network, and reports on prison abuse; the award is presented by Stern magazine, now owned by RTL Germany.
- What significant societal issues do the winning entries of this year's Stern-Preis address?
- The Stern-Preis, a prestigious German journalism award, recognized outstanding work in various categories. Düzen Tekkal and David Körzdörfer won for their documentary on the Yazidi genocide, while Isabell Beer and Isabel Ströh received the "Investigation" award for uncovering a Telegram network facilitating sexual violence. The "Lokal" category was won by journalists from the Augsburger Allgemeine for exposing abuses in a prison.
- How did the winning investigations in the 'Investigation' and 'Lokal' categories expose systemic failures or shortcomings?
- This year's Stern-Preis winners highlight critical issues in Germany and beyond. The documentary on the Yazidi genocide sheds light on a horrific event, demanding accountability and remembrance. The investigation into the Telegram network reveals the alarming reach of online spaces used to plan and coordinate sexual violence. Local reporting on prison conditions underscores the importance of investigative journalism.
- What are the longer-term implications of the reporting highlighted by this year's Stern-Preis awards, particularly concerning online safety and accountability for historical atrocities?
- The awards underscore the crucial role of investigative journalism in uncovering hidden injustices and prompting societal change. The Telegram network investigation, for example, not only exposed a vast network but also highlights the urgent need for better online moderation and stricter legal frameworks to address sexual violence. The continued focus on the Yazidi genocide through media like this documentary ensures that this tragic event is not forgotten.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the awards positively, highlighting the achievements of the winning journalists and the significance of their work. This positive framing is appropriate given the context of a press release announcing award winners, but it does not present a balanced or critical perspective on the issues covered in the award-winning journalism itself.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the award winners and their work, omitting broader context about the state of journalism in Germany or the challenges faced by journalists. While this is understandable given space constraints, the lack of information about the selection process for the jury or the overall number of submissions might leave readers with an incomplete picture.
Sustainable Development Goals
The awards recognize investigative journalism that exposes criminal networks (like the Telegram rape network) and human rights abuses (like the genocide against Yazidis). This contributes to holding perpetrators accountable and promoting justice, aligning with SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). The reporting on prison conditions in Gablingen also falls under this SDG, advocating for better institutions and oversight.