elpais.com
Technology, Loneliness, and Solitude: Ortega Klein's Jovellanos Prize-Winning Essay
Andrés Ortega Klein's "Soledad sin solitud" won the 2025 Jovellanos Essay Prize; it differentiates loneliness (negative, societal) from solitude (positive, self-reflection), exploring how technology and societal changes hinder positive solitude and increase loneliness, impacting mental and physical health.
- How does Ortega Klein's analysis connect the rise of loneliness to the impact of technology and social media, and what specific examples does he use to support his claims?
- Ortega Klein highlights the impact of technology, particularly smartphones and social media, on increasing loneliness. He uses examples such as Thanksgiving dinner scenes from The New Yorker, showing a shift from shared television viewing to individual mobile phone use. This fragmented communication, he argues, prevents genuine community.
- What are the potential long-term implications of increasing reliance on technology to address loneliness, considering both the benefits and risks as discussed in the essay?
- The author predicts a future where integration with technology, including AI, might mitigate loneliness, particularly in aging populations. However, he also warns of potential risks, such as increased control and manipulation through technology, and the erosion of individual agency and privacy.
- What is the central argument of Andrés Ortega Klein's essay "Soledad sin solitud," and what are its implications for understanding the societal challenges of loneliness in the 21st century?
- Andrés Ortega Klein's essay, "Soledad sin solitud," explores the difference between loneliness and solitude, arguing that while loneliness is a negative condition exacerbated by modern technology and urbanisation, solitude can be positive and beneficial. The book, which won the Jovellanos 2025 Essay Prize, examines how societal factors hinder the embrace of positive solitude.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames loneliness as a prevalent and largely negative societal issue, emphasizing its negative consequences and potentially downplaying individual agency and resilience. The use of terms like "disease" and "epidemic" reinforces this negative framing. The headline itself, focusing on the somewhat obscure term "solitud," might unintentionally draw attention to the negative connotations of the more commonly understood "soledad.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "disease," "epidemic," and "manipulation" to describe loneliness and its societal context. These terms carry strong negative connotations and could be replaced with more neutral alternatives such as "prevalent social issue," "widespread phenomenon," or "influencing factor." The repeated association of technology with negative consequences also contributes to a biased tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of loneliness and solitude, while barely acknowledging potential benefits of solitude or alternative perspectives on addressing loneliness. The discussion of technology's impact is largely negative, omitting potential positive uses and community-building aspects of online interaction. The article also omits discussion of potential solutions outside of governmental intervention.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between 'good' solitude and 'bad' loneliness, neglecting the nuanced spectrum of experiences and the possibility of finding positive aspects within even unwanted solitude. It also oversimplifies the relationship between technology and loneliness, ignoring the complexity of individual experiences and technological uses.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't exhibit overt gender bias. However, it would benefit from including diverse voices and experiences beyond those explicitly mentioned. The lack of gender-specific analysis in the discussion of loneliness could be considered an omission.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the increasing prevalence of loneliness and isolation, particularly due to technology and societal changes. This exacerbates social inequalities, as those already marginalized may experience more profound isolation and lack of social support, widening the gap between different social groups.