cnnespanol.cnn.com
The Conjuring: Last Rites and the Warren Legacy
The 2023 release of "The Conjuring: Last Rites" revives interest in Ed and Lorraine Warren, paranormal investigators whose cases inspired a 10-film franchise, though the veracity of their investigations remains debated.
- How did the Warrens' investigations contribute to the creation of a successful horror film franchise?
- Numerous Warren cases, including the Amityville Horror, the Perron family haunting, the Annabelle doll, and the Enfield poltergeist, served as inspiration for the "Conjuring" franchise's 10 films. The franchise's box office success demonstrates the public's fascination with their paranormal claims, despite their lack of scientific validation.
- What is the impact of the "The Conjuring: Last Rites" film release on the public perception of Ed and Lorraine Warren's paranormal investigations?
- The film's release has reignited public interest in the Warrens' work and their claims of demonic possessions and haunted houses. This renewed interest highlights the enduring cultural influence of their investigations, despite ongoing skepticism surrounding their methods and findings.
- What are the long-term implications of the continued success of the "Conjuring" franchise on the public's understanding of and engagement with paranormal claims?
- The franchise's success normalizes and perpetuates the believability of paranormal narratives. This impacts the public's critical assessment of such claims and potentially influences the reception of future paranormal investigations, whether legitimate or fraudulent.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a relatively neutral overview of the Warren's investigations and the resulting film franchise. While it acknowledges the controversy surrounding the veracity of their claims, it doesn't overtly favor either side. The structure, starting with the film's release and moving to the historical context, is logical and chronological. However, the emphasis on the success of the film franchise might unintentionally overshadow the skepticism surrounding the Warren's work.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. Terms like "famous," "investigate," and "claimed" are used appropriately. There's a slight leaning towards sensationalism in phrases like "houses embrujadas" and "objetos poseídos," but these are balanced by factual reporting. The article avoids loaded language that clearly favors one side.
Bias by Omission
While the article provides a comprehensive overview of several key cases investigated by the Warrens, it could benefit from including perspectives from skeptics who have debunked some of their claims. This omission could be seen as downplaying the criticisms leveled against the Warrens' work. Additionally, details about the methodologies used by the Warrens during their investigations are largely absent, limiting the reader's ability to critically assess their findings.