english.elpais.com
The Last of Us" Season 2 Concludes, Sets Up Abby-Focused Season 3
The second season of HBO's "The Last of Us" concludes with a focus on revenge's devastating impact, using shifting perspectives to explore the complex moral implications of violence and setting up a third season focused on Abby's viewpoint.
- How does the show's use of shifting perspectives enhance its exploration of moral complexities and the consequences of revenge?
- The show's narrative structure, emphasizing both Ellie and Joel's and Abby's perspectives, avoids simplistic moral judgments. By exploring the consequences of Joel's actions from multiple viewpoints, the series demonstrates the complexities of revenge and its far-reaching effects.
- What are the immediate consequences of Joel's actions in "The Last of Us," and how does the show portray the cyclical nature of revenge?
- The second season of "The Last of Us" concludes by highlighting revenge's cyclical nature and destructive consequences, culminating in Ellie and Joel's actions triggering a chain of violence. The season masterfully uses shifting perspectives to underscore the devastating impact of revenge.
- What are the potential future implications of shifting the narrative focus to Abby in the upcoming third season, and what deeper understanding of revenge might this perspective provide?
- The upcoming third season, focusing on Abby's perspective, promises to complete the narrative by exploring the motivations and consequences of revenge from the opposing side. This shift allows for a deeper understanding of the systemic implications of violence and the human cost of revenge.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing heavily favors Ellie and Joel's perspective initially, building empathy for their actions and setting up Abby as the antagonist. The narrative structure highlights the consequences of Joel's actions, but only from the viewpoints of those affected by them. The shift in perspective to Abby in season three is mentioned as crucial to understanding the "full picture", implicitly acknowledging this initial bias.
Language Bias
The language used is largely descriptive and analytical, although phrases like "glaringly selfish act" and "final monster" could be considered somewhat loaded. While they convey the author's interpretation, more neutral alternatives could be used to maintain a purely objective tone. For example, instead of "final monster", a description of Abby's actions and motivations could be offered. The emotional descriptions like "cold sweat" are subjective and could be replaced with a more objective summary of the viewer's emotional experience.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on Ellie and Joel's perspective, potentially omitting crucial details or perspectives from other characters that could offer a more nuanced understanding of the events. The limited exploration of Abby's perspective before the shift in focus for season three could be considered a bias by omission, though this might be intentional to build suspense and create a dramatic shift.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a somewhat simplified view of the moral implications of suffering, suggesting a dichotomy between viewing pain as inherently valuable versus completely meaningless. It overlooks the complexity of how individuals find meaning and growth in the context of hardship, and the potential for both positive and negative outcomes resulting from trauma.
Sustainable Development Goals
The show explores the cyclical nature of violence and revenge, highlighting the devastating consequences of hatred and the importance of empathy and understanding to break these cycles. By shifting perspectives and showing the justifications of both Ellie and Abby, the show promotes critical thinking about conflict resolution and the pursuit of justice.