nos.nl
Thialf Ice Stadium Breaks Even Thanks to Energy Hub
The Thialf ice stadium in the Netherlands avoided losses last year due to a new energy hub consisting of two large batteries and 5000 solar panels, allowing it to buy and store energy at low prices and sell it back at high prices.
- What is the primary financial impact of the new energy hub at Thialf ice stadium?
- The energy hub enabled Thialf to avoid losses in the past year. Its director stated that without the batteries, the stadium would not have been able to break even. The system significantly reduces energy costs, a major expense for the stadium.
- How did the Thialf ice stadium achieve this energy cost reduction, and what were the preceding challenges?
- Thialf installed two large batteries and 5000 solar panels, coupled with software to buy and store energy at low prices and sell it back when prices are high. Previously, high energy costs, exacerbated by rising electricity prices, caused significant financial problems. A prior solar panel installation failed due to fire safety concerns, but was later reinstated after improvements and government funding.
- What are the future challenges and prospects for Thialf's financial sustainability, considering the success of the energy hub?
- While the energy hub has stabilized Thialf's finances, the director notes that costs for energy tax, grid management, and transport remain a concern. The stadium needs to continue finding innovative solutions to manage these costs and ensure long-term financial viability.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story positively, highlighting the success of Thialf's sustainability initiatives and its financial recovery. The headline emphasizes the positive outcome ('Verduurzaming Thialf werpt vruchten af: afgelopen jaar geen verlies gedraaid') which translates to 'Thialf's sustainability yields fruit: no losses last year'. The introduction immediately focuses on the lack of losses, setting a positive tone. While the challenges are mentioned, the overall emphasis is on the successful implementation and positive results of the energy hub.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, but some phrasing could be considered slightly positive, such as describing the energy hub as 'druk[t] de energierekening van het stadion wat' (somewhat reduces the stadium's energy bill). The use of 'beheersbaar' (manageable) to describe the energy costs implies a positive outcome. More neutral alternatives could be 'reduces' and 'controlled', respectively. Overall, the language isn't heavily biased, but it leans slightly positive.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including a broader discussion of the financial challenges Thialf faced before the sustainability initiatives. While the energy costs are mentioned as a major problem, providing concrete figures or details on other financial difficulties would give a more complete picture of the situation. Further, a discussion of the potential environmental impact, beyond cost savings, would add depth. Given space constraints, this might be acceptable, but further context would enrich the narrative.
Sustainable Development Goals
Thialf ice stadium implemented a sustainable energy solution, including solar panels and batteries, significantly reducing its energy costs and preventing financial losses. This directly contributes to SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) by promoting renewable energy sources and improving energy efficiency.