liberation.fr
Togo's Constitutional Shift Consolidates Gnassingbé's Power
Faure Gnassingbé, ruling Togo for two decades, is now the President of the Council of Ministers after a constitutional change abolishing direct presidential elections, securing his power through his party's supermajority in recent elections amid opposition protests and restricted media access.
- What are the immediate consequences of Togo's constitutional changes for its political landscape and Gnassingbé's power?
- Following a constitutional change, Faure Gnassingbé, who has ruled Togo for 20 years, is now President of the Council of Ministers, the highest executive position. This avoids a potentially contested fifth presidential term election. His party, the Union for the Republic, secured a supermajority in recent legislative and senatorial elections.
- What are the potential long-term implications of Togo's altered political system for democratic governance and stability in the region?
- Gnassingbé's transition to President of the Council of Ministers represents a significant shift in Togo's governance structure. The lack of international observer access to the elections raises concerns about democratic legitimacy. This transition might foreshadow similar power consolidation tactics in other African nations.
- How did the recent legislative and senatorial elections contribute to Gnassingbé's continued rule, and what role did opposition parties play?
- The constitutional amendment abolishing direct presidential elections and establishing a parliamentary system allows Gnassingbé to maintain power. His party's overwhelming electoral victories, despite boycotts from opposition parties and restricted media access, solidify his control for at least six years. This has prompted protests from opposition groups.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes Gnassingbé's continued control and the opposition's limited success. The headline (if one existed) likely would reinforce this. The opening sentences highlight Gnassingbé's enduring power despite the constitutional change, setting a tone that portrays him as the central figure and the driver of events. The article's structure prioritizes Gnassingbé's actions and statements over a balanced presentation of all sides. The description of the election results focuses on the ruling party's overwhelming victory, giving less attention to the opposition's claims of irregularities or unfair practices.
Language Bias
While the article attempts to present a neutral tone, certain word choices subtly influence the reader's perception. Terms like "tour de passe-passe constitutionnel" and "triomphe électoral" carry negative and positive connotations respectively, suggesting a pre-determined interpretation. Neutral alternatives could be "constitutional changes" and "election results." The description of the opposition's actions as a "dérive monarchique" is a strong accusation that needs further contextualization or qualification.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspective of Faure Gnassingbé and his supporters, neglecting in-depth perspectives from a broader range of opposition voices beyond the quoted statements from Jean-Pierre Fabre and Me Dodji Apévon. The lack of detailed analysis of the opposition's arguments and the specifics of their criticisms weakens the article's objectivity. While the article mentions a protest, it doesn't delve into the specifics of the protest's size, impact or demands. The article also omits details about the international community's reaction to the constitutional changes and the election results. This omission prevents a complete understanding of the international context and potential implications.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the situation, framing it as a clear-cut case of Gnassingbé maintaining power versus the opposition's resistance. It doesn't explore the complexities of Togolese politics, including potential internal divisions within the opposition, or the nuances of the constitutional changes beyond their impact on Gnassingbé's power. The narrative largely ignores potential motivations or justifications for the constitutional changes from the ruling party's perspective.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes a situation where the president of Togo has manipulated the constitution to remain in power, abolishing the popular election of the head of state and establishing a parliamentary system that favors his party. This undermines democratic institutions, limits political participation, and suppresses opposition voices, all of which negatively impacts the achievement of SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice for all and building effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.