dw.com
Trump Criticizes UN, Praises German Shift from Green Policies
During his UN General Assembly address on September 23, 2025, President Trump sharply criticized the UN, particularly its handling of immigration and support for peace efforts, while praising Germany's new government for abandoning its previous "green" energy and migration policies.
- What were the main criticisms leveled by President Trump against the United Nations during his speech?
- Trump criticized the UN for its perceived lack of support for his peace initiatives in the Gaza Strip and Ukraine, its role in uncontrolled immigration into the US, and for creating new problems instead of solving existing ones. He specifically accused the UN of supporting illegal immigration to the United States.
- What are the potential implications of Trump's call for a complete European halt to Russian energy purchases?
- Trump's demand for an immediate end to European purchases of Russian energy, while already partially implemented by many EU states, could intensify pressure on remaining countries like Hungary and Slovakia still reliant on Russian oil. It also raises the question of the economic and political consequences of such a complete embargo across the European Union and the wider impact on global energy markets.
- How did President Trump assess Germany's new government's policies, and what was the reaction to his comments?
- Trump praised Germany's new government under Chancellor Merz for abandoning what he termed a 'failed' green energy and migration policy, claiming they had 'gone green and bankrupt'. His comments were seen as a direct jab at former German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, who presided over the session.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced account of Trump's speech, including both his criticisms of the UN and his praise for Germany's new government. However, the headline, while factual, could be perceived as framing Trump's criticisms more prominently than his positive remarks. The ordering of information, placing the criticism of the UN earlier, also subtly emphasizes this aspect.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, reporting Trump's words directly. However, phrases such as "frontal attack" could be considered slightly loaded. The article also uses quotes from Trump directly, which could be considered to add bias if these are taken out of context. The use of 'ostry ton' (sharp tone) to describe the speech could be considered slightly subjective.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including additional perspectives beyond Trump's statements and the reactions within the UN. For example, reactions from other world leaders or analyses of the potential consequences of Trump's proposals. The lack of specific figures regarding the financial implications of the energy policies also presents a potential omission. However, space constraints likely limit the depth of analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
Trump's criticism of the UN's role in conflict resolution and immigration, and his call for stronger action against Russia, directly relates to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). His negative assessment of the UN's effectiveness undermines international cooperation crucial for achieving this goal. The call to halt energy purchases from Russia aims to pressure Russia to stop the war in Ukraine, which is essential for peace and justice. However, his approach may be counterproductive to multilateral efforts.