elpais.com
Trump's Anti-Science Agenda: A Threat to Global Science
The article discusses the threats to scientific research posed by Donald Trump's anti-science stance and policies, illustrating the potential consequences for universities and scientists.
Spanish
Spain
PoliticsUs PoliticsScienceEducationResistanceThreats
The New College Of FloridaHeritage FoundationNational Institutes Of HealthAmerican Association For The Advancement Of Science (Aaas)Department Of Education
Donald TrumpRon DesantisRobert Kennedy Jr.Christopher RufoAgustin Fuentes
- What is the author's call to action?
- The author calls for global solidarity and support for US scientists who are resisting the anti-science movement. They emphasize that simply doing and teaching basic science has become an act of political resistance, highlighting the global nature of the threat.
- What is the effect of self-censorship in universities?
- Universities are starting to self-censor research and initiatives to avoid potential attacks, creating an environment of fear and coercion. This self-censorship threatens to stifle scientific progress and crucial research.
- Why does the author argue that STEM fields are not immune to the threats?
- Some scientists believe that STEM fields are safer from attacks than other sciences, but the author argues that this is incorrect. STEM fields are interconnected with other sciences and are not immune to attacks on diversity, inclusion, and climate science.
- What is the main threat to scientific research highlighted in the article?
- Donald Trump's anti-science stance and policies pose a significant threat to scientific research and scientists in the US and globally. His administration's actions target public health, climate, human biology, and education, potentially causing lasting damage.
- How does the author illustrate the potential consequences of Trump's policies on universities?
- The author uses the example of Florida under Governor DeSantis to illustrate how Trump's anti-science policies might affect universities. DeSantis's actions led to the removal of courses and professors focused on climate change, human diversity, and human rights. This exemplifies a broader pattern of restricting scientific knowledge.