lexpress.fr
Trump's Kayfabe Presidency: Blurring Reality and Performance in Political Communication
Donald Trump's January 20, 2021, inauguration is analyzed through the lens of professional wrestling's "kayfabe" concept, revealing how his supporters interpret his often contradictory statements as performance rather than literal truth, thus contributing to his political success.
- How did Donald Trump's use of kayfabe, a professional wrestling concept, contribute to his political success?
- On January 20th, 2021, Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 47th president of the United States. His success and communication style are better understood through the lens of professional wrestling than psychiatry. This approach highlights the deliberate blurring of lines between reality and performance, a key element of his political strategy.
- What are the similarities and differences between Trump's use of kayfabe and the political tactic of dog whistling?
- Trump's political communication utilizes "kayfabe," a wrestling term for maintaining a fictional persona. His supporters often interpret his outlandish statements and falsehoods as theatrical performances, focusing on the symbolic meaning rather than literal truth. This strategy allows him to rally support while avoiding accountability for factual inaccuracies.
- What are the long-term implications of Trump's blurring of reality and performance in political discourse, and how might this impact future political campaigns?
- Trump's use of kayfabe creates a unique political metalanguage. Supporters may understand his statements as performative rather than factual, while opponents interpret them literally. This duality optimizes attention and solidifies his support base, even amidst contradictory statements and policy proposals. This approach may represent a broader trend in political communication.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Trump's communication style through the lens of professional wrestling, shaping the reader's interpretation by emphasizing the performative and theatrical aspects of his public persona. The headline and introduction subtly guide the reader toward this specific viewpoint, potentially neglecting other equally relevant interpretations of his actions and words.
Language Bias
While the language is generally neutral and descriptive, the repeated use of terms like "outrancières" (outrageous) and the characterization of Trump's supporters' interpretation as "suspension of disbelief" carries a slight negative connotation. The phrasing could be improved to maintain a more objective tone, for instance, by replacing "outrancières" with "unconventional" and "suspension of disbelief" with "willingness to accept theatricality".
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on Trump's communication style and its relation to professional wrestling, neglecting other potential contributing factors to his success. While the wrestling metaphor is insightful, omitting socioeconomic factors, policy positions, and the influence of media coverage creates a potentially incomplete picture. The lack of alternative perspectives on Trump's appeal, beyond the 'suspension of disbelief' explanation, might limit the reader's understanding of his broad support.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a false dichotomy by suggesting that understanding Trump's appeal lies solely in either psychiatric analysis or the wrestling analogy. Other factors, such as political and economic contexts, are ignored, oversimplifying a complex phenomenon. This framing may lead readers to believe these are the only viable explanations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses Donald Trump appointing Linda McMahon, former CEO of WWE, as Secretary of Education, despite his later campaign promise to abolish the Department of Education. This highlights a disconnect between political promises and actions, potentially undermining the quality and stability of the education system. The focus on entertainment and spectacle over policy substance could negatively impact educational progress.