
gr.euronews.com
Twelve-Day War: Israel's Strike on Iran Delays, but Doesn't Destroy, Nuclear Program
A 12-day war between Israel and Iran began on June 13, 2025, with Israel launching surprise attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities and military targets, achieving air superiority through covert commando operations and disabling Iranian air defenses; despite extensive damage, Iran's nuclear program was only delayed by about two years.
- How did the preemptive actions of Israeli commandos and Mossad contribute to the overall success of the air campaign?
- The Israeli operation involved advanced weaponry, covert commando operations deep within Iran, and the establishment of a secret drone base near Tehran to counter Iranian ground-to-ground missiles. This preemptive strategy, coupled with coordinated US attacks, aimed to significantly set back Iran's nuclear program.
- What were the immediate consequences of the Israeli-led military operation against Iran's nuclear program in June 2025?
- In June 2025, Israel launched a 12-day war against Iran, targeting nuclear facilities, air defenses, and military leaders. Israeli commandos and Mossad operatives secretly disabled Iranian air defenses before the air strikes, securing air superiority and enabling near-unimpeded operations.
- What are the long-term implications of the 12-day war on regional stability and the global nuclear non-proliferation efforts?
- Despite inflicting heavy damage on Iranian nuclear facilities and killing numerous high-ranking officials, the 12-day war only delayed Iran's nuclear program by approximately two years, according to the Pentagon. This highlights the challenges of completely dismantling a well-established nuclear program through military action alone.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently highlights Israeli military prowess and strategic success. Headlines (not provided in source text) would likely emphasize Israel's decisive actions, air superiority, and commando operations. The opening sentence sets the stage by emphasizing the 'amazing' actions of the commandos, implicitly portraying Israel as the protagonist. The inclusion of specific casualty numbers for Iranian officials and scientists, while potentially factual, serves to further emphasize Israeli success.
Language Bias
The article employs language that is largely favorable to Israel. Terms such as 'amazing,' 'decisive,' 'full control,' and 'complete victory' are used to describe Israeli actions, while descriptions of Iranian capabilities and actions are less positive and less detailed. The use of phrases such as 'retaliatory attacks' to describe Iranian actions may subtly portray them as defensive, implying aggression on the Israeli side. Neutral alternatives could include more balanced descriptions focusing on actions and their measurable effects.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Israeli perspective and military achievements, omitting potential Iranian perspectives on the conflict's causes, justifications, and consequences. The article also doesn't explore the long-term impacts of the conflict on regional stability or international relations beyond the immediate aftermath. The human cost on both sides, outside of the mentioned casualties of Iranian generals and scientists, is largely absent. While space constraints may be a factor, the lack of these crucial elements contributes to a biased narrative.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the conflict, framing it as a clear-cut victory for Israel despite the fact that Iran's nuclear program was not completely destroyed and retaliatory attacks caused significant damage to Israel. The narrative overlooks the complexity of the situation and the potential for long-term consequences.
Gender Bias
The article does not contain overt gender bias; however, the focus is almost exclusively on military and political leaders, and there is no mention of the roles women might have played on either side of the conflict. This omission inadvertently reinforces a traditional, male-dominated view of warfare.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes a 12-day war between Israel and Iran, resulting in significant loss of life and infrastructure damage. This armed conflict directly undermines peace and security, and the actions taken by both sides raise concerns about the stability of the region and adherence to international law.